It’s raining Memphis!

… Memphis properties, that is. ‘Distressed’ or ‘bargain’ properties. Cheap cheap cheap!!

A little while ago in ‘Safe investing means doing your homework‘ I mentioned that some members of the United Federation of Property Spruikers have moved onto shifting US properties to Kiwis and Australians. The exact commission structure (i.e. what’s in it for them) isn’t clear from the outside, but I assume they’re getting a clip of each ‘bargain’ sale that the lambs to the slaughter er, clients actually buy. If anyone reading this can clarify those arrangements, please drop me a line at the email address here.

I pointed to a recent promotional email doing the rounds in typical bullish tones, in this case inviting people who want to “retire through property in 2011 without hype, nonsense or unfounded promises” and “create cash flow safely, simply and fast!” to join a sales-pitch/educational tour taking in Phoenix and Memphis early next year — to look at the exceptional ‘opportunities’ the local spruikers will find for the strangers on their shores.

Well, out of nowhere (i.e. I didn’t sign up for the emails) I’ve now started receiving email promotions from a spruiker in Blackpool, England (!) offering me … guess what? … cheap properties in Memphis! Ha! Who woulda thunk it? See… this is today’s message:

Email marketing from a UK-based promoter selling 'amazing deals' in Memphis USA to investors

Don’t you love the Christmas theme? Classy.

Now, call me skeptical (I’ve been called worse) but I just wonder how and why these ‘amazing’ these deals with their ‘amazing’ finance packages aren’t being snaffled up by the locals. Why is that, do you think, if they’re soooo amazing? Huh?

I pay attention on these matters and others to Australian author and whistle-blower Neil Jenman, scourge of the property spruikers, who says it loud and says it plain (written for Aussies, but tune in Kiwis):

AMERICAN WARNING

A deadly trap for Aussie investors.

by Neil Jenman

Here’s a confident prediction: Hundreds (probably thousands) of Australian investors are going to lose millions of dollars in the American property market.

Right now, it seems to be all the rage, the latest fad. Buy real estate in the United States. It’s easy. Prices for American homes are so low and our dollar is so high that an investment in ‘the home of the brave and the land of the free’ seems like a really good idea.

Unfortunately, it’s not a good idea. For the average mum-and-dad Australian investor, buying real estate in America is a very bad idea. Never mind what the Aussie spruikers tell you, never mind how good it sounds, it really is too good to be true.

These days, a number of Australian spruikers have set up companies and are selling real estate in America to Aussies. Some of the men ‘behind’ these companies are the same villains who were once ripping off investors with over-priced property deals in Australia. As any police officer will tell you, once a crook, always a crook. Continue reading →

Nice-looking bike!

This caught my eye in Howick yesterday … Nice!

It looks great — so why so bashful about calling it a Suzuki? (pic by Peter Aranyi) Click to read specs.

It’s a Suzuki Boulevard M109R Limited Edition … I didn’t see the word ‘Suzuki’ on it anywhere … which made me think about the power of branding … and my friend Mark’s latest ‘low cost’ mode of transport (well, compared to his Range Rover):

Nice windscreen wipers, but Isn't the air-conditioning a bit wasted on this? (pic by Peter Aranyi)

What statements do these two bikes declare about their owners? Is it like what dogs say about their owners?

When listing achievements, always use the third person …

Peter McWilliams Self-Publishing, Self-Taught

One of my heroes was Peter McWilliams who taught me so much about life in general, and publishing in particular (along with my pal Roger Steele, on both counts).

In 1991, Peter McWilliams published a terrifically practical and instructive book on publishing — Self-Publishing, Self-Taught … which he sold for US$95 — and that price point was one of the first lessons about publishing. I bought a copy in the early 1990s directly from him. It’s one of my treasures.

On the back cover it says…

$95*
(no kidding)

with the *pointing to text which reads:

“* For $95 you get everything (well almost everything) Peter McWilliams knows about self-publishing. His self-publishing credentials include: a series of poetry books that has sold 3.4 million copies, a book on mediation that was #1 on the New York Times best seller list, How to Survive the Loss of Love with 2 million copies in print, a series of computer books (including The Personal Computer Book) which sold 1.6 million copies, You Can’t Afford the Luxury of Negative Thought with 300,000 copies in print, LIFE 101 (another New York Times best seller) and DO IT which is also a New York Times best seller.
It took him 24 years to accomplish all this, and what he learned cost him far more than $95. Among the things he’s learned is, when listing achievements, always use the third person — it doesn’t sound like bragging. This is precisely the technique he used when writing this paragraph. If you don’t get $95 worth of value from this book, he will send you a refund. He is now going to get something to eat.”


That last line, ‘He is now going to get something to eat’ was typical of the playful, self-aware sense of humour (and humility) McWilliams displayed in his writing. He was a wonderful writer and human being and a part of me still mourns his loss.

.
I was reminded of that rule: ‘When listing achievements, always use the third person‘ when I stumbled across this positively gushing biographical ‘blurb’ about travelling salesman and ‘internet marketing’ guru Shaun Stenning (posted BY Shaun Stenning, it says) … on the Hubpages website … funnily enough, on the very same website through which someone mysteriously attempted to fool Google into linking the word s-c-a-m with my name.
Well, what do you know? I thought. Shaun Stenning is a contributor to that very same website! Hmmm…

Anyway, enjoy this, but make sure you’re sitting down in case you fall down — it’s pretty rich (e.g. ‘the seeds of greatness were always there!’):

Gee, he sounds WONDERFUL. So why all the complaints and demands for refunds?

Who Is Shaun Stenning?

by Shaun Stenning

Shaun Stenning is no stranger to hard work. In fact it is hard to believe what he has done at such a young age. From partly trained accountant to personal trainer to barman, the seeds of greatness were always there, but it was the internet that was ultimately calling.

Today the “You can’t be only 25” year old Shaun Stenning is recognized on almost every continent as one of the world’s best internet marketers and IM educators.

Shaun’s passion for people and his industry is infectious and infiltrates every area of his organisation.

After 8 years of running internet businesses for himself Shaun has built an incredible faculty of successful online entrepreneurs over the last 2 years through events and ongoing education around the world.

First he proved that the internet was a goldmine for himself, then he built systems to help every day, “non-techy” people get great results for themselves. Continue reading →

Is narcissism the new normal?

Hilarious! (image: Huffington Post - click)

I love the irony in this news.

Apparently an upcoming revision of the psychiatric diagnostic standards manual, the DSM-V, has removed the narcissistic personality disorder from its roster… does that mean it has become so pervasive that it’s no longer thought of as pathological?

Is narcissism the new normal?

Well, maybe it is.

Certainly it would explain why people like this can make such exaggerated and misleading statements and claims about their own legend-in-their-own-lunchbox-style success, achievements and so-called ‘status’.

Read about some of the issues here at Huffington Post in this intriguing article from Judith Acosta.

(PS Is it narcissistic to have a blog?)

Getting your brand into your customers eyes?

One of the books I read which changed the way I looked at the world was Vance Packard’s late 1950s The Hidden Persuaders — an account of how psychology entered the advertising industry. I recommend it. Funnily enough Bob Dylan recounted one of his NYC hosts telling him in the 1960s that the ‘high priests’ of psychology all worked in advertising.

BMW tried a new trick. (click to view video)

This video clip is about an experimental advertisement for BMW motorbikes which used a bright photographic flash through a stencil to imprint the company logo on the audience’s retinas.

Interesting (and effective?)  when it was combined with a script that played a bit of a parlour trick on them.

Watch a mini behind-the-scenes-doco and the ad (below the fold)… Continue reading →

Keeping the ‘network’ in its place

Jason Kottke put me on to this wry and wise observation from Scott Simpson…

Not a bad rule of thumb. (Honoured more in the breach, I think, by many.)

… And I thoroughly agree.

‘Love the one you’re with’ seems like a good goal. ‘Split attention’ is rampant.

Nothing says ‘you are not interesting enough’ than setting the phone on the table at coffee/lunch/dinner … and waiting for someone more important to call or text.  Bleurgh!

Unless you’re a midwife, or a doctor on call… leave it in the bag or pocket (or car? What a concept!) – P

I think I would die …

I think I would probably die of embarrassment if ‘property guru’, ‘internet marketing expert’ and spruiker Dean Letfus endorsed me as a ‘kindred spirit’ like this:

Leave aside the Freudian slip of ‘In a pool of sharks I found Steve to be the “real deal” ‘ … (erm, you mean a REAL SHARK?)

Dean’s humble self-assessment: ‘I am arguably the most high profile educator in New Zealand’ and his description of his fellow property spruiker and business partner thus: ‘Steve is the most experienced investor I know in NZ’ strike me as being in the same class as those T shirts you see emblazoned with ‘WORLD’S GREATEST LOVER‘.

Surely these statements are not intended to be taken as anything but shallow puffery … or a JOKE?

If Steve Goodey is really the ‘most experienced investor’ Dean Letfus knows, then he probably needs to get out and meet more investors. Or perhaps start telling the truth?

Likewise Steve Goodey’s description of himself as “a NZ property investing icon who has established a proven track record of local success” is, well, a tad overblown, in my opinion. (An icon, Steve? You? Oh, please!)

At some point, people writing this sort of sugary, grandiose, hyperbolic sales-speak and BS should take a step back, examine the words they’re using and ask themselves: Is that actually true? Really? Am I ‘one of NZ’s most successful property investing experts’? Truly? Or am I just a glib low-rent huckster trying to make a buck?

The embedded weasel words Continue reading →

An insane order of priorities …

Once again, Jon Stewart uses his platform — on Comedy Central (!!) — to sound a call for reason and justice and fair treatment.

It's a win-win-win-win .... just f——— DO it!

Watch as he castigates the Republican senators (and their mealy-mouthed supporters) for filibustering on the 9/11 First Responders’ medical benefits bill while whistling ‘tax cuts for the rich’ through an easy passage.

The bill would provide $7 billion in benefits for those who first responded on 9/11 and are now experiencing subsequent health problems such as cancer and respiratory disease. While it passed the House, Republicans have blocked the bill from advancing in the Senate. — Huffington Post

Then, in the second clip, he brings the voices of those affected to the screen … so good. So terrible.

Videos below the fold … Continue reading →

Does ANYONE doubt that this guy’s rights have been infringed?

From the BBC today:

'A Swedish prosecutor has said that she didn't need to produce 'a single shred of evidence' to justify its execution of a warrant for Assange's arrest and hearings which ended up 'putting me in solitary confinement for 10 days.' - Julian Assange

Julian Assange has told reporters that the US investigation into his Wikileaks organisation was “aggressive” and “illegal”.

He went on to say that over 85% of his organisation’s economic resources are spent fighting “technical, legal and political attacks”.

Mr Assange was speaking to reporters outside the Suffolk mansion of supporter Vaughan Smith. He is under house arrest while awaiting extradition proceedings by a Swedish prosecutor where he is facing sex allegations.

…. Mr Assange said his organisation had so far published only 2,000 of the 250,000 cables they have obtained.

Call me naive, but I hadn’t thought of the phrase ‘decapitation attacks’.

People like to present WikiLeaks as just me and my backpack. It’s not true. We’re a large organisation. The permanent staff is relatively small. In Cable-gate we had about 20 full-time staff. But it is resilient. It is designed to withstand decapitation attacks, and our publishing rate actually increased over the time that I was in solitary confinement.

Read the BBC’s profile of Julian Assange.

And also, very interesting, The Salty Droid (who I had reason to think about recently in relation to the Internet ninja cowboys apparently trying to mess with us) has quite a different take on Julian Assange: SaltyDroid vs. WikiLeaks
… saying, among other things, Assange has ‘Rasputin eyes’ … and pointing to “the magical power of self-proclamation“. Fair comment.

RIP Tom Newnham

This hero of the anti-racist protest movement (and so much more) has died.
Farewell indeed to Tom Newnham whose book By Batons and Barbed Wire, about the 1981 Springbok Tour and the popular social uprising that disrupted it — found its way into many homes, including mine. He was an activist in more ways than that. A lion.

That ‘Rugby Tour’ and the political and social ructions it provoked, stirred our conscience as a nation — and revealed the nasty side (and the heroic side) of many people … from the powerful to the humble.

My friend and fellow photographer (I’m not worthy to wipe the dust off his UV filters!) John Miller took this shot of Tom doing good work …

Tom Newnham addressing the protest rally at Fowlds Park, Morningside, just before everyone marched off to the final battle of the Springbok Tour, Sat, 12th September, 1981. We will be remembering you, next year, Tom - photo: JOHN MILLER

This comment, from John’s Facebook wall, says a lot which is true:

Mihirawhiti Searancke Really Tom and others like him were the Julian Assange‘s of then along with Owen Wilkes and other’s who worked tirelessly on issues that gave us the strength to ask questions of a then very Anglosaxon male outfit. RIP Tom and say hello to Owen and Sid, Hana and all those other greenies, anti nukes, Maori rights supporters.

Yes, Well said. Thank you.

Along with Merita Mita, whose film Patu! recorded the intensity of the anti-Tour protests. Tom’s efforts to help motivate and organise — and give voice to — the courage of ordinary New Zealanders motivated by outrage at social injustice was his life’s work.

Farewell, Tom.

(Tom’s NZPA Obituary)

Internet ninja cowboys … spoofing revisited

UPDATED: Check out the comments on this post for ‘interesting developments…’.

Some readers might remember an episode that occurred earlier this year:  Internet ninja cowboys … or schoolboys?

Blackhat techniques? {snort!} (image: hathorizons.com - click)

Hilarious! A few hours after I set up ThePaepae.com’s new Facebook page yesterday, overnight we had a sudden surge of email… with a lot of ‘Please confirm your subscription to our mailing list’ messages.

It seems someone (who? I wonder) had a bit of time on their hands and submitted ThePaepae.com’s email address (not disclosed on the Facebook page, so no ‘leak’ there) to a bunch of mail list subscription pages.

Like a lot of ‘internet marketing’ ruses, these juvenile tricks might have worked in the past, but fortunately they’re pretty easy to spot.

Well, guess what?

More ‘juvenile tricks’ (By coincidence? You be the judge.)

A couple of days ago, somebody submitted thePaepae.com’s email address to a website called ‘allspammedup.com’ — adding a fake message from ‘Peter’ [ahem] extending the invitation ‘spam away baby‘…

Wow. Impressive internet skills! (Er, not!) Pretending to be me and asking for spam.

Well, hardy har, har, har! I wonder who could possibly have done that? And for what possible reason?

As the listserv message about the last wanker er, prankster spelt out very clearly:

This is usually done in retribution for having posted something on a public forum which made the perpetrator lose face. …

… in most cases this person will be a technically skilled individual who will know what steps need to be taken in order to hide one’s track. It is usually much easier to identify the perpetrator using traditional investigative methods, such as looking for technically skilled individuals that the victim has recently angered.

Can anyone think of anyone who this description possibly might fit? By any chance? Anyone?

Who could it b– … hang on, I’m getting an idea!

UPDATED: Check out the comments on this post for ‘interesting developments…’

Yeah, why not have a sense of humour?

I just signed in (and out) of my vodafone account. Here’s the ‘thanks for calling’ screen…

Yeah, why not have an attitude? Better than being BORING!

It’s all marketing. (How you feel.)

The Ridiculist – catchy title, nice approach

In a case of ‘sometimes if you don’t laugh, you’ll cry’, from The Spruiker’s Lament

Peter Aranyi makes fun of spruikers and travelling salesmen
as if they were actually ridiculous

At the time I hadn’t seen Anderson Cooper’s The Ridiculist (“a new hypocrisy-exposing segment on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360“) … but I like it. And I like his sane, calm and sensible approach.*

It’s tough being hassled or mocked for one’s foibles, blunders, mis-steps and blind spots. Even worse, for our consistent questionable behaviour. We’re each of us thin-skinned about something.

So sometimes the hardest thing is to respond to someone shining a spotlight on us (or casting our actions in a negative light) by asking: ‘Gee, have they got a point? Can my actions be fairly seen that way?’

It’s also super-easy to jump to conclusions about someone we see as ‘opposing’ us, or our ideas. It’s easy to ‘make the critic wrong’, or to characterise them as ‘only saying that’ because they’re on the other team (or the ‘out group’, as we discussed in the origins of conflict).

We’ve seen that the only real pre-requisite for conflict — sometimes enmity — is to have an ‘us’ and a ‘them’. This, I suggest, comes from our tribal nature as humans (but I’m no expert).

This feeling of estrangement from/towards others can be amplified by their overt criticism of our actions. For instance, my ongoing ruminations and reflections about the marketing methods of certain spruikers discussed now and then here at thePaepae.com and elsewhere have created some ill-will towards me. That’s understandable.

From what some of my ‘targets’ have communicated about that experience (through blogs, forum posts, email and [ahem] phone calls to me), it must be bewildering and frustrating for them to cop it like this from, um, lil ol’ me. In casting around for explanations, they seem to me to far too readily grasp for an easy projection of implicitly unfair ‘competitive bashing’ or that I’m driven by a ‘commercial vendetta’ motivation — inaccurately, in my view. That ain’t it, fellas. Sorry. I’m just calling it like I see it.

As I said as part of another conversation about smearing the messenger:

We all hate criticism — the trouble is,
sometimes we deserve it.

* See Anderson Cooper’s take on ‘Pizza Girl’ below the fold. Nice. Lessons for all of us, I think. Continue reading →

What a great title! How to Smell a Rat

What a terrific title for a book on keeping yourself safe financially. Naturally, the Madoff and the Stanford scandals feature as sobering lessons…

The Five Signs of Financial Fraud are:

Sign #1 Your advisor also has custody of your assets

Sign #2 Quoted returns are consistently great! Almost too good to be true

Sign # 3 Flashy tactics — The investng strategy isn’t understandable — is murky, flashy or “too complicated” for him (her, or it) to describe so you easily understand.

Sign #4 Exclusivity … Your adviser promotes benefits like exclusivity that don’t impact results.

The scam is to try to make you think: “this guy is clearly super-duper long-term successful — which in [the victim’s] mind speak to legitimacy and that [scammer] can be trusted. And he’s a nice guy to boot — he gives to charity!

Sign #5 You didn’t do your own due diligence, but a trusted intermediary did. (Lesson: Due diligence is your job no one else’s!)

From How to Smell a Rat by Ken Fisher and Lara Hoffmans.

And look at this rogues’ gallery compiled by the author — with, in some cases, pictures of rats with the caption ‘(Actual photo unavailable)’.  Nice touch!

from www.smell-a-rat.com/investment-frauds

(Ha! And some of my subjects on this blog complain about their treatment here.)

The Spruikers’ Lament

Q: Why is that guy Peter picking on us?

image: http://jameswoodward.wordpress.com (click)

A: There can be only one reason: He must be in ‘direct competition’ with us! Yeah!

Oh yes. Actually, maybe there’s another reason: He’s a hypocrite. That’s it. A nasty hypocrite. Because (how does it go again? Oh yes, I remember…) He’s in the exactly the same industry as us.
Yep, he’s just like us:

He’s a black pot, we‘re a bunch of black kettles, but he’s always ‘bashing’ us … it’s a cynicial competitive tactic.

He’s knocks us and our schemes, and draws attention to our sales methods, which he describes as ‘hyperbolic’ and ‘misleading’ with our ‘dubious’ claims of expertise and success … even though he is just the same. Yeah! It’s pretty obvious he really wants to be the top spruiker himself … (even though he seems to spit on spruikers).

Best line: ” … some of the smear campaigns in here have been very clever and well crafted smear smear [sic] campaigns (that deride others) while seeming to be in public interest.” (from this post.)

Peter obviously wants people to buy overpriced bullshit ‘internet marketing’ softwarey-type stuff and US tax liens from HIM instead of us … although [cough] he doesn’t actually sell anything like that.

Or he wants people to buy apartments off the plans/Fiji sections/subdivision plots/bare swampland for a ‘quick flick’/Gold Coast developments/distressed Memphis houses for a fat commission from HIM … except, oops, [cough, splutter] Peter doesn’t actually sell any real estate like that.

Nor does Peter run offshore high pressure ‘buying tours’ or $27-for-two-seats-or-free-from-our-mates weekend sell-fest ‘educational seminars’, where the punters go into the draw for a colour TV or an IPhone/iPad to induce them to stay till our specialist commission salesmen and motivators-for-hire have had a really good crack at getting them to sign up on the spot. (Hang on, he doesn’t do ANY of that … so, actually, can someone remind me again: How is Peter in ‘direct competition’ with us spruikers? I forget.)

Maybe there’s a third reason: Perhaps it’s his character. Yeah. He’s just a really cynical, nasty piece of work. He clearly has too much idle time. It’s just terrible how he pays attention to us and it’s simply ghastly that he’s got his bloody blog www.thePaepae.com where people read our names (ugh! and don’t mention Google!) and they can see how he documents our hype and bluster … and sometimes he makes fun of us … and then he even publishes our threatening letters (and mocks us some more!)

Peter Aranyi makes fun of spruikers and travelling salesmen as if they were actually ridiculous. … Maybe he’s a HATER!?!