No April fool, Dean Letfus claims: “DEFAMATION!”

The Jekyll & Hyde-like transformation of Dean Letfus into Phil Jones continues.
Now, apparently, he’s sending half-baked threats of ‘legal action’ to people who point out his, um, inconsistencies

Dean Letfus at Shaun Stenning event Phuket March 2010

Self-proclaimed property guru and 'Ethical Investing Strategist' Dean Letfus (right, in clown pyjamas and blue wig, with Facebook friend) says he's been DEFAMED!

Earlier this week I pointed to lawyer/investor/whistleblower David Whitburn’s blog in which he shared his concerns about the way US tax liens were being sold to naive NZ investors by a new company called “NZ Property Guru’s [sic]”.

As I see it, Whitburn’s blog post is a clearly written, well-supported and detailed explanation of his concerns about the sales methods and marketing materials these operators use to sell US tax liens. His comments are based on his personal observations and direct experience. He covers some of the background and inter-connected history of the spruikers involved: Dean Letfus, Phil Jones, Steve Goodey and (new boy in town) Shaun Stenning. Continue reading →

I heart Rachel Maddow … trying to increase the cost of lying

Thanks Rachel. Straight talkin' just NEVER gets old (image: HuffPo)

Remember the full page ad she took out to say it wasn’t true?

He’s apparently still saying it is.
So, Rachel Maddow let Scott Brown have it straight …

You [Senator Brown] made something up that’s not true. You have such a lack of respect for your conservative donor base around the country that you don’t care if what you tell them is true or not. You think it doesn’t matter in politics if what you say is true or not.

‘Just give me the money,’ makes for a good story, a good scary liberal story.

‘If you feel scared, then send me your money.’ Who cares if the story’s true or not. Who cares.

Turns out, I care.

Somebody’s gotta draw a line somewhere. Lying should have consequences. You shouldn’t get to flat out lie in the conduct of your business as United States Senator and get away with it.

Everybody says that this is just the way people do things, this is just politics. But politics is for something. Politics is about more than just politicians. Politics is about our country. And I don’t concede that the only thing we can expect from people in politics is for them to lie to us and not care, and get away with it because we don’t expect better.

So, I recognize that this is probably futile, but I’m going to say it. Senator Brown, you need to stop lying about this.

As she says: “Somebody’s gotta draw a line somewhere. Lying should have consequences.” and right at the end of the video clip below:

I’m trying to increase the cost of you lying.”
.

Oh, they’re playing our song.

UPDATE: I was looking at the photo of Scott Brown over Rachel Maddow’s shoulder and thinking, ‘Where can I get a ‘LIAR’ stamp like that? Then look what I found:

This’ll come in handy!

Mocking Bill O’Reilly – such a juicy target

Recently on Fox News, Mr-Exception-that-proves-the-rule Shep Smith may have been (-subtly-) taking the mickey out of Bill O’Reilly over his infamous “We’ll do it live!” meltdown…

But for my money, by far the funniest spoof of O’Reilly going thermonuclear was the BarelyPolitical.com crew’s “Bill O’Reilly’s Producer (Unseen footage)” — watch:
(warning: some blue language)

From the talented bunch that brought you 2007’s Obama Girl. (sigh)

Wow. Dean Letfus = Phil Jones (?)

Remember my comment:
Choose your enemies carefully because you will become like them” ?
Well look at this:

Dean Leftus replaces Phil Jones hawking US tax liens to investors with Steve Goodey 2010

Duplicity or a genuine change of heart? Dean Letfus replaces Phil Jones. (Click to view bigger.)

Property spruiker Dean Letfus has replaced his old boss (and nemesis?) Phil Jones in a ‘venture’ promoting US tax liens to NZ investors. (This after Letfus comprehensively criticized US tax liens as a suitable investment ‘vehicle’ publicly last year  … in no uncertain terms. What can have changed?)

Extraordinary.

(With thanks to David Whitburn.)

David Frum’s ‘Waterloo’ blog post

— that got him sacked.

www.frumforum.com/waterloo

Just so we can find it easily…. oh, and it’s worth reading! Telling the truth about the ‘divergent interests’ of the Republican leadership and the ‘conservative entertainment industry’

I’ve been on a soapbox for months now about the harm that our overheated talk is doing to us. Yes it mobilizes supporters – but by mobilizing them with hysterical accusations and pseudo-information, overheated talk has made it impossible for representatives to represent and elected leaders to lead. The real leaders are on TV and radio, and they have very different imperatives from people in government. Talk radio thrives on confrontation and recrimination. When Rush Limbaugh said that he wanted President Obama to fail, he was intelligently explaining his own interests. What he omitted to say – but what is equally true – is that he also wants Republicans to fail. If Republicans succeed – if they govern successfully in office and negotiate attractive compromises out of office – Rush’s listeners get less angry. And if they are less angry, they listen to the radio less, and hear fewer ads for Sleepnumber beds.

So today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished. For the cause they purport to represent, it’s Waterloo all right: ours.

His wife’s follow up is good too:
www.huffingtonpost.com/danielle-crittenden/put-down-your-pitchforks_b_514791.html

Nice writing on a smear campaign

Rachel Maddow in flight on MSNBC

MSNBC took out a full-page ad in Friday’s Boston Globe for a ‘letter’ from their talk show host Rachel Maddow to her fellow Massachusetts citizens. This was a response to Senator Scott Brown’s claims (in an effort to raise money, apparently) that she is planning a run against him in 2012.

Her letter contains some nice touches (“It’s just not true. Honestly. I swear. No, really.”)
Read it for yourself…

Hi, I’m Rachel Maddow. I host a TV show on MSNBC. I also live in Western Massachusetts, in the beautiful hilltowns of Hampshire County.

This week, our new U.S. Senator, Scott Brown, sent a fundraising letter that says I’m running against him for Senate when he’s up for re-election in 2012.

I’m not running against Scott Brown. I never said I was running against Scott Brown. The Massachusetts Democratic Party never asked me to run against Scott Brown. It’s just not true. Honestly. I swear. No, really.

Senator Brown never even tried to find out if it was true, before using the made-up threat of me running against him, to try to scare donors into giving him more money. He sent the letter all around the country, to the out-of-state conservative activists who provided so much of the funding for his successful Senate campaign.

Do you remember when Mitt Romney ran for President after being our Governor and he went around the country insulting Massachusetts, talking about what an awful state we are? To have our new Senator raising money around the country by saying how terrible one of his Massachusetts constituents is, kind of feels the same way to me.

It’s standard now for conservatives to invent scary fake threats to run against — things like the made-up ‘death panels’ in health reform, or the fake controversy about the president’s birth certificate. Senator Scott Brown’s only been in DC seven weeks, but he already seems to be fitting right in with how conservatives operate there.

I’m running this ad not because I’m running against Scott Brown — I’m not, he made that up — but because he’s the Senator for all of us, and maybe this will make him think twice the next time he wants to smear one of his constituents to raise money out-of-state.

My show airs at 9PM Eastern in Massachusetts on MSNBC. So far, Scott Brown refuses to come on. Maybe he’ll change his mind — I hope he does.

Sincerely,

Rachel Maddow

The tone is good, and the dredging up of previous lies (things ‘made-up’) and smear campaigns works. It’s well written and in a likeable ‘voice’. Here’s how it looked… Continue reading →

Apple iPad: Here it comes …

Steve Jobs with his pet project (image: Newsweek)

Fake Steve Jobs Daniel Lyons (writing as, er, Daniel Lyons) in Newsweek puts a compelling case for:

Why The iPad Will Change Everything

Jobs is a relentless perfectionist whose company creates such beautifully designed products that they have changed our expectations about how everything around us should work. He has an uncanny ability to cook up gadgets that we didn’t know we needed, but then suddenly can’t live without. The iPad is his personal pet project. It’s something he’s been working on for years, reportedly even while he was recuperating from a liver transplant. Jobs calls it “a truly magical and revolutionary device,” and supposedly has told people close to him that the iPad is the most important thing he’s ever done.

Which is why so many of us raced to San Francisco in January to get an up-close view of the miraculous tablet. Yet my first thought, as I watched Jobs run through his demo, was that it seemed like no big deal. It’s a bigger version of the iPod Touch, right? Then I got a chance to use an iPad, and it hit me: I want one.

A good comment about Apple’s infamous secrecy rings true …

Let’s be honest: Jobs and his crew make the Church of Scientology look like a bunch of easygoing sweethearts.

Worth reading the whole article at Newsweek.

Does it sound too sycophantic to say I absolutely agree that this device is a game changer? Its simplicity of interface and its connected-ness make it (or something like it) the NEXT STEP. Which was nicely expressed in Mike Monteiro’s prophesy:

The iPad isn’t the future of computing;
it’s a replacement for computing.

Men talk shoulder to shoulder

Men don’t talk face to face.
They talk shoulder to shoulder,
while they’re working on something.

I just heard this insight in a BBC World Service documentary on the Men’s Shed movement in Australia.

So true.

There are exceptions, but this is a good rule of thumb to bear in mind.

(Cheers and kudos to my brotha Mike A and his boatshed, which by pure stint of his personality and willingness to consistently provide a space, creates magic just like this around the potbelly stove … when I can get there. I’m grateful Mike. Cheers.)

What is a Men’s Shed?

Most men have learned from our culture that they don’t talk about feelings and emotions. There has been little encouragement for men to take an interest in their own health and well-being. Unlike women, most men are reluctant to talk about their emotions and that means that they usually don’t ask for help.
… Good health is based on many factors including feeling good about yourself, being productive and valuable to your community, connecting to friends and maintaining an active body and an active mind.
Becoming a member of a Men’s Shed gives a man that safe and busy environment where he can find many of these things in an atmosphere of old-fashioned mateship. And, importantly, there is no pressure. Men can just come and have a yarn and a cuppa if that is all they’re looking for.

How is THIS good for the TRUMP brand?

Somebody tell me how selling the pie-in-the-sky, one-chance-in-nine-million New Zealand Lotto draw enhances The Donald or his brand … Please.

Donald Trump sells his name and face to sell lottery tickets - photo by Peter Aranyi

Trump thinking big — coming to a mall near you (click to enlarge)

OK, so it’s not just priests who seek to cover sin…

Alan Greenspan - no mea culpa forthcoming
(AP photo)

The most telling omission in this paper is that the word “fraud” does not appear. But the world knows that the collapse of the financial system had, at its core, the largest financial fraud of all time. That fraud was in the origination, the rating, the underwriting and the issuance of credit default swaps against sub-prime mortgages issued largely by private originators and securitized by the largest banks. …

The Federal Reserve is a regulator. Alan Greenspan was the chief regulator for 18 years. He failed spectacularly. So did his colleagues, at the Office of Thrift Supervision and elsewhere. These facts are not obscured here. They are ignored.

John Kenneth Galbraith ‘reviewing’ Alan Greenspan’s report on the Global Financial Crisis.

This is how straight-talking J.K. Galbraith opens his article: Continue reading →

There’s something about a cover-up that offends us …

God told me to cover sin?

Remember this guy:

I always seek to “cover” another’s sin. I try and focus on the good in others and hide their faults. It is simply trying to obey several specific bible verses. …
Well I had one particular situation where I knew things that were not right and people were potentially being taken advantage of. I have over and over again had to stop myself from saying anything publicly and it has been incredibly hard for me. Every time I said to God that I wanted to see this thing put right HE would say to me D**** it is your job to cover sin, justice is my problem”.

The head of the Catholic church in Ireland, Cardinal Sean Brady seemed stuck on defending his past inaction and cover up, reportedly justifying the failure of the church to unmask a serial child abuser in the priesthood in these terms:

Earlier Brady said it was the responsibility of his diocesan bishop, as well as the leader of Smyth’s separate Catholic order of priests, to tell police. But he said the church didn’t do this because of “a culture of silence about this, a culture of secrecy.”
“Yes, I knew that these were crimes,” Brady said. “But I did not feel that it was my responsibility to denounce the actions of Brendan Smyth to the police. Now I know with hindsight that I should have done more, but I thought at the time I was doing what I was required to do.”

A somewhat similar situation to to our “sin covering” friend above, don’t you think?

Brady’s eventual statement of public remorse and apology (at last!!) came a few days later on St Patrick’s day, no less, reports the BBC:

“This week a painful episode from my own past has come before me. I have listened to reaction from people to my role in events 35 years ago. I want to say to anyone who has been hurt by any failure on my part that I apologise to you with all my heart. I also apologise to all those who feel I have let them down. Looking back I am ashamed that I have not always upheld the values that I profess and believe in.”

It was bloody hard work to get that ‘confession’ out of him…

Brady says ‘this week’ but for the victims it’s been a lifetime.

Now, just today, the New York Times reports more that makes me ask:

Where will the reluctance to face the sin and missteps of the past end?

Top Vatican officials — including the future Pope Benedict XVI — did not defrock a priest who molested as many as 200 deaf boys, even though several American bishops repeatedly warned them that failure to act on the matter could embarrass the church, according to church files newly unearthed as part of a lawsuit.

The internal correspondence from bishops in Wisconsin directly to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future pope, shows that while church officials tussled over whether the priest should be dismissed, their highest priority was protecting the church from scandal.

So “several American bishops repeatedly warned them” — Good step, but why didn’t they blow the whistle?
How much worse did it have to get?

James Cameron calls it as he sees it …

‘Let me put it this way,’ James Cameron said in an interview last month.
‘I’m happy to piss those guys off. I don’t agree with their worldview.’

Can’t argue with that.

I feel the same way about weasels who try to paint themselves as my ‘competitors’ or ‘peers in the industry’… when they’re no such thing.

Enough said.

Point and counter point … bottled water

Great example of an exposé of ‘Manufactured Demand’ for bottled water …

Followed by a ‘fake journalism’ (complete with ‘noddies’) PR/propaganda fightback by the bottled water manufacturers*…’Good Stewards of the Environment’

How do they keep a straight face?

*Let me know what BWM Report could possibly stand for.

Branding writ large

This is the fifth-most-photographed building in New York, the 28th worldwide: the Apple Store 5th Avenue New York City.

Well, it IS cool. Inside and out.

On my first visit it was just starting to rain and Apple Store staff were fitting special rubber covers to the glass steps on the spiral staircase. The shopping experience in these stores is good. San Francisco downtown store was cool in a whole differnent way.

It’s not just a Borders bookshop-type unhurried-take-your-time-look-around-get-involved-with-the-products-thing. It’s more than that.

Ahead of the 5th Ave store on the list of most-photgraphed in NYC: The Empire State Building, Times Square, Rockefeller Center, and Grand Central Terminal. Gotcha.

(via TUAW)

Karl Lagerfield – interviewed by Bruce LaBruce

Karl Lagerfield - self-portrait
source: Vice Magazine (Click for full size)

When Vice [Magazine] called me last month with an out-of-the-blue offer to fly to Paris and interview the Kaiser himself, Karl Lagerfeld—creative director of the $10 billion Chanel empire, the house of Fendi, and his own eponymous line—I jumped at the chance. I have to confess that I wasn’t an expert about the fabled fashion kingpin prior to Vice’s proposition, … I was duly excited to meet the Man Behind the Fan (which, I would soon discover, has long since been replaced by the Collar), the guru behind the dark glasses, and to try to separate the myth from the reality.

But having now met and spent time with Mr. Lagerfeld, it seems that, as close as I can figure out, the man really is the myth. It’s not that there isn’t any there there; it’s that somehow, by some strange alchemy, the person who descends the stairway of his fashion house, infinitely multiplied by mirrors, has transcended this mortal coil to become a pure creature of creativity.

Lagerfeld is a study in perpetual motion, tirelessly darting between creative endeavors while devouring both history and the ephemeral present, the zeitgeist. A voracious reader and observer of life through books and popular culture, he filters the world into his couture and other creative outlets like a sort of supercomputer. When I suggest to him in the following interview that he may have Asperger syndrome, a rare form of autism characterized by an obsessive-compulsive “disorder” manifested as a kind of genius, he concurs.

Extracts from Karl Lagerfield — interviewed by Bruce LaBruce – Vice Magazine


Your best friend is…
He’s dead, too.

What happened to him?
AIDS. That happened 20 years ago.

How did you cope with that whole period? I’m sure you knew so many great people who died of AIDS.
I don’t want to go back through that age. In those days it was a hopeless case.

It was a death sentence.
You may be a bit young to remember. It was horrible. Beyond horrible.

It decimated the fashion world.
It killed a whole generation of people.
Continue reading →