Justifying mass surveillance with ‘terror threat’ is a right wing talking point

John-Key-my-commitments-to-you-banner-640w

All over the world right wing politicians are justifying encroachments on their citizens’ civil liberties with references to the 9-11 terrorist attack or the spectre of a similar outrage.

In the US, Republican presidential-possible Governor Chris Christie has just had a crack at it, whacking ‘libertarian’ concerns about privacy and civil liberties as ‘esoteric’ or ‘intellectual debate’ … See: Christie Cites 9/11 in Assailing Libertarian Trend in G.O.P. New York Times 26/7/13.

“The next attack that comes, that kills thousands of Americans as a result, people are going to be looking back on the people having this intellectual debate and wondering whether they put. …” said Mr. Christie, before cutting himself off.

The New Zealand prime minister John Key, justifying his proposed expansion of powers for the country’s (supposedly) outward-looking, ‘international’ spy agency, the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) to allow it, by law, to carry out surveillance of Kiwis, uses a similar argument, invoking ‘terrorist threat’.

Don’t believe me? Listen to this, from last night’s Radio NZ Focus on Politics:

See? Same approach.

Chairing the Intelligence and Security committee which received submissions against his GCSB bill, John Key took a similar ‘How would you feel if people got killed because of a lack of surveillance’-type line of questioning with one of the submitters, Tech Liberty’s Thomas Beagle. Mr Key’s ‘hypothetical’, ‘What if there was a bomb at the airport and people got killed?’ is only a little short of ‘What would you say to the victim’s children?’

It’s sometimes easy to forget just how wet behind the ears John Key is when it come to issues of dissent and civil liberties. (This is the man who says he ‘can’t even remember’ what position he took on the the 1981 Sprinbok Tour protests which so divided the country.)

As we’ve already noted, when John Key dismisses legitimate criticism of his planned expansion of New Zealand’s spy laws as ‘throwing stones from the side-lines’ he is trivialising and dismissing the thoughtful, considered, courageously-expressed alarm of: Continue reading →

The slippery slope: Dissent > Protest > Politics

Rick Falkvinge on civil liberties in the age of the internet.

“The old guard is introducing censorship, wire-tapping, an end to anonymity — a crackdown on free speech.”

“If the old politicians understood that the laws they are making are the equivalent of putting microphones under every cafe table … ” (cf: like Urban Cafe? see Mystery object was a bug!)

Very good.

– P

Another stab at big-O objective journalism/media

Fear and Loathing in Modern Media_ Hunter S. Thompson on Journalism, Politics, and the Subjective

He’s wonderful, huh? Go and read the whole thing at Maria Popova’s site.

I was a fan a Hunter S. Thompson long before I got into journalism — I read Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas while I was still at high school, back in the days when I was listening to Pink Floyd’s album Meddle in what might be called ‘an altered state’ (this is all true).

I loved him for his courage, for the excellence of his writing, its corrosive strength and its punch. He made stuff up without lying. His political campaign books were eye-opening and his obituary for Richard Nixon (and the fact it was published!) astonished me … but it felt ‘right’. It felt like he was peeling back something — exposing a papering over, and the tame, establishment media had been part of the wallpapering. He burned it off.

Charles P. Pierce writing The Daily Politics Blog in Esquire, is a good current-day example of that kind of work.

I shared then and share now Thompson’s nauseous scorn for the myth or pretence of ‘big-O objectivity’ … and his febrile outrage at liars in print — or, online now, I guess.
Continue reading →

Photos from the ‘Stop the GCSB Bill’ public meeting

I went along to the packed public meeting at the Mt Albert War Memorial Hall. Standing room only.

Here are some photos. Click to view them larger. Feel free to use these images if you wish (with picture credit to Peter Aranyi, please) or contact me to get a higher resolution file.

GCSB-mtg-flyer-25-July-2013-424x600

TedThomas-GCSB-meeting

Ted Thomas

AnneSalmond-GCSB-meeting

Dame Anne Salmond

RodneyHarrison-GCSB-meeting

Rodney Harrison

Kim Dotcom

Kim Dotcom

Packed!

Packed!

Thomas Beagle

Thomas Beagle

Anne Salmon and Kit Dotcom

Anne Salmon and Kit Dotcom

Thomas Beagle

Thomas Beagle

DavidCunliffe-GCSB-meeting

David Cunliffe

Seffan Browning

Seffan Browning

David Shearer and David Parker

David Shearer and David Parker

Martyn Bradbury

Martyn Bradbury

‘News co.s aren’t in the business they pretend to be in.’

Here’s a quite smart analysis of the challenge ‘traditional’ news companies face vis-à-vis the internet eating their lunch …

Click to read at mumbrella.com.au

Click to read at mumbrella.com.au

Certainly the landscape for those working in ‘da media’ has changed (understatement!) and those who look at journalism as a career are increasingly faced with putting their skills and experience to work feeding the machine (or manipulating it).

Subscribers? Well, sure, OK, some will. But not many. And paywalls of some sort will come and be tried. There’s been some good discussion recently about The NZ Listener and National Business Review paywalls. The number of subscribers is anaemic. Continue reading →

Wry

shacklemore_ You can say what you like about ...

click to view on Twitter

via Juha Saarinen @juhasaarinen

You’re doing ‘hit-pieces’ on government critics, now David? Seriously?

Perhaps David Farrar has been hanging around with internet bully-boys too much?

Perhaps David Farrar has been hanging around with internet bully-boys too much? Now he’s acting like one of them. Oo-er. [Psst: I added the bits in red.]

You may remember the name David Farrar. I write about him here now and then, usually fairly affectionately (well, comparatively).

Yeah, we all know David is a National Party spin doctor, and has been employed for polling/advice/propaganda/pep-talks/training/driving lessons. (‘Gums for hire’, I call people like him, although they may do some of that stuff purely as a hobby.) He’s performed no doubt highly valuable work in various National Party leaders’ offices (Bolger, Shipley, English, Brash). No problem.

And I’ve always found David Farrar a far more likeable media manipulator than, say, that foaming RWNJ [redacted]. (Least-said-soonest-mended). 
Continue reading →

‘…the classic kind of despotic manoeuvre Muldoon would have tried to pull off at his most power-drunk.’

NZ Herald columnist Deborah Hill Cone lets John Key and Steven Joyce have it with both barrels in her piece today: Govt’s event-veto powers in SkyCity deal bizarre relating to a ‘bizarre‘ clause in the just-inked SkyCity convention-centre-for-casino-licence-extension-and-hundreds-of-extra-poker-machines deal with the National-led government.

Caption: 'GURU FOR THE UNSOPHISTICATED'

‘GURU FOR THE UNSOPHISTICATED’

I’m a fan of Hill Cone’s writing, as we have discussed before. When she was writing for The National Business Review, she certainly saw Richmastery spruiker Phil Jones for what he was straight away. (That’s her exposé, right.)

Deborah Hill Cone doesn’t suit all tastes. (So what?) It’s worth reading her whole column. But here’s her [scathing] conclusion, if you’re pressed for time:

Just to recap: the Government did a backroom deal with a private casino operator and is now demanding the right to tell the private operator what events it can run there. Talk about the worst of both worlds. You can’t really blame profit-driven SkyCity for trying to get as much as they can out of the Government in this deal – although it was quite absurd for the major listed corporation to describe itself as being “victimised” by the process, the poor petal.

But you can expect the Government to abide by broad principles of transparency and freedom of expression. Sneer all you like at the left-wing devotion to notions of consultation and hand-holding, but that is starting to sound downright appealing in contrast to the Orwellian arrogance of Big Brother, oops Steven Joyce.

Key and Joyce seem to have started to believe their own hype and think they have a divine cult-like power invested in them which they are entitled to exercise without restraint.
Continue reading →

A manifesto

I don't offer this as a 'prescription'. Pick and mix  ... whatever you you find of value.

I don’t offer this as a ‘prescription’. Pick and mix … whatever you you find of value. From Holstee (click)

See also James Taylor’s wonderful advice: ‘The secret of life is enjoying the passage of time…’
Continue reading →

Winston Peters — no stars in his eyes about John Key’s GCSB Bill

Voice of experience. Winston Peters on TVNZ's Q&A programme today. (click)

Voice of experience. Winston Peters talking about John Key’s spy agency bill on TVNZ’s Q&A programme today. (click)

New Zealand First Party leader Winston Peters is one of the current NZ Parliament’s most experienced MPs, a lawyer, and someone who (whether you agree with him or not) has thought and spoken about NZ’s constitutional issues for decades.

Here’s his interview on TVNZ’s Q&A programme this morning about John Key’s controversial proposed expansion of the powers of the state spy agency, the Government Communications Security Bureau.

Asked directly whether he believes the Prime Minister’s overt claim that the bill does not NOT actually seek to expand the powers of the GCSB, Mr Peters described John Key thus:

[He’s] a sharemarket trader who likes to get a deal done as fast as possible, and is not a lawyer.

  [MP3 file here.]

As Peters points out in this interview with TVNZ political editor Corin Dann, the Prime Minister failed to seek the NZ First leader’s expertise on the Intelligence and Security committee which is considering the proposed spying law changes — under urgency — and failed to even seek NZ First’s support “until he got desperate”.

Watch the full interview (8’37”) at TVNZondemand.co.nz

– P

Another day in paradise

Howick Golf Course this morning. That's my boy swinging his iron.

Howick Golf Club this morning. That’s my boy swinging his iron.

Life is pretty good. I know I’m lucky. I appreciate it, too.

– P

See also: A great way to spend a Sunday morning
and Rain, followed by an earthquake. Hello Auckland.

Shearer on Shearer — on Radio NZ’s Focus on Politics

podcastsI listen to a couple of Radio NZ podcasts fairly religiously each week: Mediawatch and Focus on Politics.

The latest (Friday’s) helping of Focus on Politics featured a good-length interview with Labour Party leader David Shearer by RNZ political editor Brent Edwards.

I found it interesting, and noted it was far from the um-er stammering performance Shearer is so often accused of by partisans who seek to reflexively discredit him, and will stoop to anything to do so.

Have a listen if you’re interested…

Hard to argue with his point about a differential in the way his statements and veracity are regarded/treated by some news media ‘players’ versus how they treat the Prime Minister. But, having worked in the fish bowl that is the Press Gallery, my view of these things is that most journos do the best they can to be fair … and shrieks of ‘bloody biased!’ tend to be emitted on a fairly universal distribution.

Joh Bjelke-Petersen, famously corrupt Queensland Premier, used to call dealing with reporters ‘Feeding the chooks’ … which always struck me as a funny, and woefully accurate description of the relationship between politicians and the political press. (See: The Press Gallery thinks it’s sooo #badass …)

– P

Related: When you can’t trust the Night Watchman. @MediawatchNZ on Duncan Garner’s spasm

Spotted in comments on Fran O’Sullivan’s double-minded article on the SkyCity casino licence extension deal with John Key

pic: theepochtimes.com

I used to think of gambling as ‘a tax on stupidity’. Now I see it as a cynical & predatory addiction industry. (pic: theepochtimes.com)

Fran O’Sullivan is a smart person. I do sometimes wish she’d be more forthright, however.

Her article ‘Too soon to say if SkyCity deal is buy of the century‘ seems a brave attempt to couch mild criticism of the John Key/Steven Joyce/SkyCity ‘negotiation’ (cough) with a semblance of evenhandedness by dredging up the former Labour government’s 2008 ‘lemon’ buying back Tranzrail from Toll Holdings.

With all due respect to Fran, I didn’t find her comparison particularly compelling — resembling, as it does, shadowboxing. But, hey, her article is still worth a read. See what you think, it’s here.

Fran reinforces her point: that ego-driven politicians who wannadoadeal (and ditch Treasury/economic advice as an unwelcome hand brake) are an expense we taxpayers can’t really afford. That, and her documentation/reference to the shameful deceit (my word. Too strong? Maybe, maybe not) that was deployed by the National-led government against the other so-called bidders or tenderers for the convention centre deal. Fran’s clear that the deal was always SkyCity’s.

She says:

The problem is the deal created an uneven playing field and reinforces the impression that the Key Government will opt for backroom deals over due process.

As we’ve discussed before, it seems pretty clear the dubious ‘tender process’ was gerrymandered and shaped for SkyCity, who, I’ve seen reported were at one stage at the bottom of the list of preferred bidders and, (surprise!) ended up ‘winning’ it.

It appears the other so-called ‘bidders’ (scare quotes in Fran’s article) were not much more than window-dressing. The other bidders apparently weren’t told that hundreds of poker machine licences (and what else?) were ‘on the table’ so to speak.

It seems they were, as the old saying goes, treated like mushrooms: Kept in the dark and fed bullshit.

Continue reading →

William Shakespeare’s ‘Star Wars’ {snort}

Quirk Books (click)

Quirk Books (click)

Watch the trailer:  Continue reading →

Two comedians speak up against animal testing

John Banks animals-care

Pic: Fairfax/stuff.co.nz

The ACT Party’s sole MP John Banks faced mockery and disrespect for his stand against animal testing in recent Parliamentary debate about amendments to the Psychoactive Substances Bill. Some people questioned his sanity or his social policy ‘priorities’. That’s a pretty harsh assessment, I thought when I heard it, but fair enough. Fair comment. A lot of people are suffering in our lingering economic recession. Not just the jobless.

I personally don’t agree with John Banks or ACT Party policy on a number of issues. (So what?) I also think the ‘free market’ ginger group is past its use-by date, on artificial life support, and it has been a hard-right trojan horse in John Key’s administration, e.g. Charter Schools. (But again, so what?)

At the last election ACT attracted a scant 1.1% of the vote — less than the polls predicted — and Mr Banks is only in Parliament (as a ‘Party leader’!) because of the deal struck with National in Epsom. Judging by ACT’s disintegration in the political opinion polls since the last election, not many other New Zealanders agree with their ‘recipe’ either. But that’s how democracy works — put up an idea or a point of view or ‘team’ … and see how it rates. See: ACT: ‘Zero backing. Zilch, nil, nothing at all.’

Next year it’s possible (likely?) we’ll see a Colin Crag Christian Conservative MP. Dunno.

Anyway, John Banks is, in my experience, a person who compartmentalizes his thinking … and his life. He is, as we have discussed, somewhat of a split personality (see: Three faces of Eve … er, John Banks). He sometimes appears capable of massive, unselfconscious hypocrisy to observers not from his galaxy. e.g. speaking in favour of ‘cleaning up’ electoral laws within months of his own dubious ‘anonymous’ campaign donations scandal which has, no doubt, so degraded the ACT Party’s public reputation. Nail, meet coffin.
Continue reading →