David Farrier’s unsettling new documentary ‘Mister Organ’ – a film to watch through your fingers

Film poster for David Farrier's MISTER ORGAN released Nov 2022
A disturbing and worthwhile film

In this age of entitled white men behaving badly, it’s common to hear the term “malignant narcissist”

Anyone who’s had the misfortune to be sucked into the orbit or one of these miscreants, (let alone been obliged to, say, sue one for copyright infringement) eventually learns that the ONLY ‘exit strategy’ is to completely disengage from their bullying, manipulation and gaslighting.

You don’t win a war with one of these psychic energy sinkholes. At best you come out on top in a skirmish and discontinue hostilities — you’ll leave the field with (at least) scratches and bite-marks. You may, as I did in that case, eke out a small victory, strike a blow, achieve a settlement, get a pay-out, whatever.

You may also retrieve some of your own reputation – which the narcissist will have smeared, comprehensively, in the course of his ‘dispute’ with you. He will have beguilied some idiots (looking at you Sean Plunket) and made even some of your friends doubt you; some of them will accuse you of somehow aiding and abetting the narcissist’s campaign against you, or suggesting you ‘added’ to the problem, drawing it out.

But in the end, let me assure you: there is nothing whatsoever to be gained from prolonging engagement with one of these characters. Nothing. Let go. Walk away.

So watching David Farrier’s excellent, disturbing documentary film ‘Mister Organ‘ last night reminded me of bygone days – not exactly warm nostalgia, but thankfully, not PTSD, either.

Who is ‘playing’ whom?

Given the power imbalance in the making of a documentary, one might think that the filmmaker has all the advantages, seeing as how they can frame the narrative, and edit what we the audience see/hear, and in what sequence. But to his credit, Farrier made it quickly apparent that the subject, [alleged] filthy liar and fantasist Michael Organ, was actually more astute. It reminded me of that adage: ‘Never argue with an idiot. They’ll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.’

‘The hunter becomes the hunted’ is another cliche, we’ve all heard, right? It was clear, fairly early in the film, that the delusional-but-not-untalented Michael Organ was extremely psychologically invested in the serious ‘game’ he was playing — and that his goal was to turn the tables, to confuse, destabilise, bewilder, and to punish David Farrier.

Whatever Farrier hoped, Organ’s fantasy life wasn’t going to collapse like a house of cards once he was exposed as the lying manipulative bully that he appears to be. Indeed, as the film lays out in awful, creepy detail, Michael Organ appears to be clearly energised by the battle of wits, exercising his ‘power’ against his victims, endlessly spinning his [debunked] fantasies and lies, even if the battle is for an ever-diminishing pile of ashes.

I worked with someone who, just like Michael Organ is portrayed in the film, knew how to find pressure points, inventing disputes if necessary, to manipulate and throw others off-balance so he could continue to take advantage of them. I formed the view then that this type of person needs to dominate others, to define themselves as the peak of the pyramid, and to (in effect) rob others, sucking their life-energy. Sounds dramatic, I know, sorry. But you had to be there.

I also later had the misfortune to be involved in a business purchase where the vendor turned out to be very much a bully, a liar and a narcissist — oppressing his family and employees with threats, broken promises, outbursts of nasty hot anger. And lies of course. Endless lies

Farrier’s film, cataloguing as it does Michael Organ’s victims, and those too afraid (justifiably, from experience) to speak out against Organ is horrifying. Honestly, these types get away with so much, for so long.

All of which is to say: GO — Go and see David Farrier’s movie ‘Mister Organ‘. I highly recommend it. It is an exceptional piece of documentary filming. I saw it last night and woke up feeling anxious for Farrier this morning.

No way is this over. Sorry.

Mister Organ‘, the film, is probably only Part Two of the tale of Michael Organ and David Farrier. (Part One being his series of articles about Organ’s crazed wheel clamping at Bashford Antiques hosted over at The Spinoff: The incredibly weird tale behind the Bashford Antiques clamping story.)

Michael Organ (still from David Farrier’s documentary MISTER ORGAN – aptly a Madman production)

The psychic attention boost that this film and attendant publicity will give Michael Organ will, I predict, stimulate and energise him. It’ll top-up what someone in the film called the ‘demonic’ side of Michael Organ. It will provoke him. God knows how it will end.

Poor David.

– P

Facts are stated to the best of my knowledge and commentary is my honest opinion. Corrections or clarifications are always welcome by email. Comments are open, but may be moderated.
– Best wishes, Peter Aranyi

The Wright Family steps into the spotlight. They’re what you probably expected.

Duncan Greive* at The Spinoff has published a really worthwhile interview with the rich, white, social conservative businessman Wayne Wright whose wealth is funding that internet radio platform, ‘The Platform’, which I cited recently. (And which seems to me to be inching its way towards Alex Jones InfoWars/Qanon/antivax ‘conspiracy’ territory.)

If you’re interested in media in New Zealand, this is essential reading:

Wayne Wright and his mum Chloe are apparently the decision-makers behind the funding of Sean Plunket’s um, new media outlet. Click to read at TheSpinoff.co.nz

Seriously, go and read it at The Spinoff. (Make sure you have something in your stomach.)

Oh? He’s a big fan of Mike Hosking?

Apparently Wayne Wright is enormously impressed with Mike Hosking.

Gee that’s funny, Wayne. Mike’s made an impression on me too — just not a positive one. see e.g. The road to Mike Hosking, vilifier of young women

Remember Mike Hosking identifying the ‘real victims’ of John Key’s ponytail-pulling fixation? Oh boy. mp3 file
Click through for the hilarious audio

Also, funny that Wayne Wright mentions he loved Paul Henry too.
Of course some of us remember that Paul Henry and Mike Hosking were both secretly funded (lol) by casino operator SkyCity … to act as ‘SkyCity Ambassadors’. That meant using their media platforms (Hosking NewsTalkZB and TVNZ at the time; Paul Henry at RadioLIVE) to give SkyCity executives long, soft blowjobs— I mean interviews … and to generally be, well, (sorry boys) “in the pocket of SkyCity” seems an apt way to describe it. (Hosking said he worked for that money. Oh yes, I’m sure.)

Eventually people noticed, and some of it came out. Awkward.
I recall Hosking’s heroic attempt at a ‘Nothing to see here, folks’ defence… in fact I posted it here: Mike Hosking: ‘a note of some clarification’ re SkyCity

Update: Here’s a picture of Chloe Wright with National MP Chris Bishop:

Wright Family Foundation Chief Executive Chloe Wright with National MP Chris Bishop.

Anyway, I for one welcome Wayne Wright and Chloe Wright coming out of the woodwork to stand up for their previously secret funding – well, confidential, for a while, anyway. (I recall Plunket being unwilling to tell Duncan last time he asked.)
But you will know them by their fruits, as someone said …

You Will Know Them by Their Fruits Matthew 7:15-20
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

Continue reading →

I hope next week’s anti-government protest doesn’t get as entrenched as the last one

I’ve been thinking about that 23 day protest at Parliament earlier this year, in the light of the Stuff Circuit ‘Fire and Fury’ documentary (highly recommended) and recent promotion by religious spruiker Brian Tamaki, and others, of another march to Parliament Grounds planned for next week. This one, apparently, promises mock “People’s trials” on the steps of Parliament. Ugly.

Click to read article at Newsroom.co.nz

Televangelist and twice-failed mainstream political force ‘EFTpos-tle’ Brian Tamaki has “commanded” his followers to attend – even if they can’t get leave to do so approved by their employers. “Me and god would be disappointed…” he said in a video message (below) to the faithful. (Oh boy. Where do I start?)
Tamaki’s Wikipedia entry is instructive:

Brian Raymond Tamaki (born 2 February 1958), is a New Zealand fundamentalist Christian religious leader and right-wing political activist. A Tainui man from the Ngati Ngawaero and Ngati Maniapoto tribes, he is the leader of Destiny Church, a pentecostal Christian organisation in New Zealand which advocates strict adherence to fundamentalist biblical morality, and is notable for its position against homosexuality, its patriarchal views, and for its calls for a return to biblical conservative family values and morals. He has also stated the COVID-19 pandemic is a sign the world has “strayed from God”, which led to widespread condemnation, with one Anglican vicar describing Tamaki as “dangerous”. This, alongside many comments he has made, and how he has amassed a large fortune by preaching the prosperity gospel to a mostly working-class audience, has made him a controversial figure in New Zealand.

His church has led a strong campaign that opposes COVID-19 vaccination, lockdowns and mask mandates since the pandemic began in New Zealand, and are currently engaging in protests against mandates at Parliament. In 2022 Tamaki was being briefly imprisoned for breaching bail conditions as he took part in an anti-vaccination protest in Christchurch. In the same year, following its failure to file, Destiny Church’s charity status was revoked.”

(So, Mahatma Gandhi he is not.)
https://twitter.com/kelvin_morganNZ/status/1559371509180690432?s=20&t=2LiAmrb8pLfSuOmRKcn6Gw

The NZ Herald reports:

Police will be monitoring a protest led by Destiny Church’s Brian Tamaki that intends marching through central Wellington before staging a mock trial at Parliament.
New details have emerged of the rally set to take place on August 23 that will see protesters from across New Zealand assemble at Civic Square before marching to Parliament where they will hold a self-styled “people’s court”.
Police today said they were aware of the protest activity planned for Wellington later this month but would not say if they were in talks with Tamaki about the day.
“We recognise the lawful right to protest,” said a spokesperson.
“Police will be monitoring the event and will be working to ensure there is limited disruption to the wider public.”

No doubt the scenes in this TVNZ 1News video of the final day of the February-March anti-mandate/anti-vax/anti-government protest will be playing on some decision-makers’ minds…

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it …

The deceit at play in this

It surprises me (but it shouldn’t really) that there are still people trying to portray that protest as all about ‘peace and love’.

Continue reading →

Jane Kelsey, a lifetime of leadership

Here’s a fantastic interview by Moana Maniapoto talking with law professor and courageous public intellectual Jane Kelsey, on her retirement from university life.

The whole 17 minutes is really worth watching. It’s good to place Prof Kelsey in context with this brief, accessible retrospective look. She has always struck me as an articulate, determined, fiercely heroic, yet humble person.

Jane Kelsey has featured on this blog, last noting her involvement in the 2013 mass protests against National Party PM John Key’s unpopular strengthening of New Zealand’s security apparatus. See ‘Stop the GCSB Bill’ rallies and marches today where I captioned my photo of her (right), ‘Living treasure Professor Jane Kelsey addresses the Auckland Stop the GCSB Bill rally.’ (Yeah, OK, I gushed. But she is dynamite.)

Key took a ‘damn the protesters’ approach, seemingly determined to widen the surveillance powers the GSCB in the face of fierce public opposition, and pushing through legislation to increase the avenues in which those powers could be used. Notably, the law changes (recently defended by his ‘Minister of Spooks’ Chris Finlayson in his typical petulant fashion, even taking the time to name-check and smear Dame Anne Salmond like a twat) broadened the definition of ‘national security’ issues to allow for ‘protection’ of the ‘economic well-being’ of New Zealand i.e. commercial interests.

So, say, dairy farming giant Fonterra or, oil and gas exploration ventures, or, I guess, pig farms — you know, businesses sometimes targeted by activists and protesters over their environmental ethics and behaviour. The government can now potentially use espionage/terrorism powers and the associated secret police agencies to ‘protect’ these private enterprises. So, same old conservative Industrial Age mindset that got the planet where it is now.

It wasn’t the first time I felt John Key was motivated by some off-stage agreement or assurance he’d given one our overseas economic and security partners. He just seemed impervious to reasonable counter argument at times. Puzzling.

‘The disinformation era’

Jane Kelsey’s reflections on what Moana refers to as “the new era of protest” are also worth quoting in part, relevant as they are to recent themes:

“In the 1970s and 80s, there were lots of small protests erupted — Eva Rickard on the Raglan golf course [ …] Bastion Point, Pākaitore, of course lots of anti-Nuclear protests. But it was before the disinformation era. […] One of the things I always insisted on in protests was that it was accurate information. And now we’ve lost that. And that’s where I think a lot of the power of protest risks being lost, because it’s been devalued.”

Enjoy the video (thank you Moana and Cameron Bennett) with its evocative call to action by Prof Kelsey at the end.

Funny to catch a glimpse of a law professor’s Conviction History Report. All that ‘trespassing’. Tsk tsk. Lol. (Notably, non-violent protest.)

– P

PS Yeah, I saw what Jane Kelsey said about about avoiding ‘personalising’ the debate or denigrating opposing arguments. Prof Kelsey would probably not have called Cameron Slater a knuckle dragger as I did yesterday, or Chris Finlayson a twat. Oops. Oh well, as Slater told me during one of our coffee catch-ups back in the day: At least you won’t die wondering what I think.

Watch the Stuff Circuit doco ‘Fire and Fury’ on the ghastly, cynical disinformation campaign aiming to make the country “ungovernable” – oh, and to raise funds

What kind of political activists incite fear and alarm, set a goal to make their country “ungovernable”, milk their followers for funds, then encourage them to stand for local government posts – but tell them to conceal their affiliations for the sake of attracting votes from the ignorant?

The sleazy, in my view dangerous, certainly banned-from-Facebook ‘Voices for Freedom’ group, — headed up by disinformation entrepreneurs Libby Johnson, Alia Bland and Claire Deeks — features in this essential viewing. Stuff Circuit’s latest documentary is about the radicalisation of New Zealand via disinformation: ‘Fire and Fury’ Who’s driving a violent and misinformed New Zealand – and why.

Stuff Circuit’s ‘Fire and Fury’ reveals the poisonous disinformation campaign inciting real world violence in New Zealand with imported conspiracy theories. (click to watch the documentary at stuff.co.nz)

Hats off the the Stuff Circuit team for their diligence and courage bringing this important documentary to us, and their follow up articles: www.stuff.co.nz/national/stuff-circuit.

It’s dangerous work, reporting on the wing nuts, racists, neo-Nazis, and violent misogynists who inhabit that dark world – along with the hungry-for-celebrity info-entrepreneurs, wannabe ‘influencers’, merchandisers and grifters using their platforms to (cough) raise funds.

Ka-ching, ka-ching

Meet ‘News personality’ Chantelle Baker, who features in the Fire and Fury documentary. Chantelle Baker earned her appearance by a parade of inflammatory, misinformation-laden live streams from the protest at Parliament (sometimes ‘interviewing’ her father Leighton, the failed leader of New Zealand’s New Conservative political party). She’s now spun those activities into an earner, with more planned.

Because nothing says ‘I am a News personality’ louder than a nice big ‘DONATE button. In this case, linked to an appeal to financially support propagandist Chantelle Baker’s promised “large step forward” into “the digital media space” … and unspecified “legal action against Stuff if the finances allow”. (How very Trumpian.)
Chantelle Baker harvesting the gullible with an appeal to their sense of grievance at being … misunderstood by the evil MSM.( It’ll work, too.)

It’a worth noting that Chantelle Baker is apparently now doing this agitprop “full-time travelling around New Zealand” she says, like a wailing minstrel or busker by the sounds of it – presumably ‘raising funds’ by putting the hat out for donations at her shows? Oh well.

As she told Sean Plunket on his weird Wright Family Foundation (that’s Chloe and Wayne Wright)-funded internet radio show yesterday, Chantelle’s “job has always been more in Sales and Marketing” (that figures) … but now she and her team “have a lot of plans in place” – launching, wait for it, ‘a platform’.

Continue reading →

Facebook is a scourge. Convince me otherwise.

Robbie Nicol explains the dishonest arseholery of Mark Zuckerberg’s dying Facebook blight.

Totally worth watching: Robbie Nicol (of White Man Behind A Desk) explains …”After the protests [at Parliament Buildings, Wellington] in February, I tried to write a monologue about Facebook and radicalisation — and it ended up being 17 minutes long lol.”

Surely Facebook’s twisted, evil, money-at-all-costs approach – radicalising users by placing a higher value on negative, anger/argument-generating content over ‘likes’ – will be another nail in Facebook’s coffin.

Clip from Robbie’s video (above): Facebook rewards users who seek to enrage.

They are, simply, an evil corporation and the time will come when having worked at Facebook, in any capacity, will be a mark of shame, like tobacco lobbyists, whaling company PR, and oil & gas spin doctors.

– P

So, I was right about paid character assassin Carrick Graham, eh?

Carrick Graham in happier (‘got away with it’) times, with another member of his ugly professional-smear-jobs-by-social-media team, Cathy Odgers. As darling-of-the-right dirty blogger and Twitter personality ‘Cactus Kate’, Odgers went to work nastily and personally demeaning various targets of Graham’s client Mark Hotchin. Following the exposure of her work for Graham by the 2015 Chisholm Inquiry [into Judith Collins’ association with dirty blogger Cameron Slater w.r.t. the head of the Serious Fraud Office, investigating Hotchin], Odgers attempted to disappear and erase her … um, work.    (click photo for a link to my article ‘What the Chisholm inquiry revealed about managing the media narrative’ and more)

Today the shabby little train of denial ran out of smoke.

Payment, apology in Dirty Politics caseNewsroom

Crushing defeat for Dirty Politics PR man with apology to defamed academicsThe Spinoff

Here’s the apology wording, below. It’s ruined only by the clearly bullshit implication that there was a time when Carrick somehow didn’t know he was a devious little hatchet man oops, I mean professional dirty PR operative being paid to shred people’s reputations with lies.

Carrick Graham had the open run of his puppet/underling/bob-a-job guy Cameron Slater’s now-defunct WhaleOil hate blog. And he ran amuck. But he said today:

I am now aware that a number of statements I made about the plaintiffs were untrue, unfair, offensive, insulting and defamatory.

Right, Carrick. NOW aware. Why would anyone believe you?

What a liar.*

I’d love to ‘now be aware’ of the terms of the wriggle-out settlement Katherine Rich (of KR Hit fame)/the Food and Grocery Council paid to strand the ignoble PR tyro in court today.  Tim Murphy at Newsroom:

[Plaintiffs’ lawyer Davey] Salmon said Graham’s PR firm, Facilitate Communications Ltd, had received $365,619 from the Food and Grocery Council between November 2009 and July 2016.  In turn, the Whaleoil site had received $124,000 from Facilitate between October 2012 and 2016.

With the council having reached a settlement with the academics (which Katherine Rich was keen to keep confidential, Salmon told Justice Walker), and Slater’s Whaleoil business in liquidation and therefore likely to be an “empty damages award”, it was Graham who had faced paying out if found to have defamed the trio.

Oh well. (But what an arse, Carrick, waiting till the first day of the trial.)

Bravo to the fortitude of the smear campaign targets

They showed tremendous tenacity in the face of toddler tactics from Slater and coldly-calculated — can I call it perjury? Probably not. Just ‘inadequate disclosure’ — from Mr ‘Oh, my poor lost laptops, and their backups!’ Carrick Graham.

Credit, obviously to Nicky Hager for the exposure he gave in his book, Dirty Politics, to this shabby side of corporate ‘lobbying’ — and of course, to the still-unnamed ‘Rawshark’, the source of much of the communications (including invoices and ‘draft’ posts like KR Hit #1) on which the book and further reporting was based.

If this is all news to you, here’s some earlier reading about Carrick Graham.

– P

Facts are stated to the best of my knowledge and commentary is my honest opinion. Corrections or clarifications are always welcome by email. Comments are open, but may be moderated.
– Best wishes, Peter Aranyi

— — — —

Apology from Carrick Graham to Doug Sellman, Boyd Swinburn and Shane Bradbrook

I wish to apologise publicly for the untrue statements I have made about the plaintiffs, Professor Doug Sellman, Professor Boyd Swinburn and Mr Shane Bradbrook.
I made various defamatory comments about the plaintiffs, using various pseudonyms, on blogs published on Mr Slater’s Whale Oil website. I also encouraged, inspired or contributed to the text of certain defamatory blog posts about the plaintiffs that were published on Whale Oil, including by making payments to Cameron Slater. I did so as part of my business and in order to advance the interests of industry.
I apologise for all hurt and harm caused to the plaintiffs by those blog posts and comments.
I am now aware that a number of statements I made about the plaintiffs were untrue, unfair, offensive, insulting and defamatory.
I acknowledge that the plaintiffs’ work on the harms of tobacco, alcohol, and processed foods and beverages, was undertaken responsibly and in the public interest.
I deeply regret making the comments, and my involvement in the blog posts and comments.
I sincerely and unreservedly apologise to Professor Sellman, Professor Swinburn and Mr Bradbrook and have agreed to make a payment to them. The plaintiffs have accepted my apology and so have agreed to end their legal proceedings against me.
3 March 2021
Carrick Graham

— — — —

see also: What the Chisholm inquiry revealed about managing the media narrative

You cannot believe your eyes. (The Queen’s Gambit’s visual effects are astounding.)

Like, I guess, millions of other viewers, I throughly enjoyed the Netflix 7 hour series The Queen’s Gambit.

Not only was it perfectly cast and acted. The writing, the music, the costumes and sets were all amazing.

The visual effects, by a company called Chicken Bone FX, were absolutely astounding. They were so much more than just ‘special effects’. Here’s their skite reel for that show. Wow.

– P

CBFX “The Queen’s Gambit” Reel from Chicken Bone FX on Vimeo.

Who funds Matthew Hooton?

Wow it’s only been a month since Matthew Hooton was working in “strategic communications” for the NZ National Party Leader, in the Leader of the Opposition’s office at Parliament. No worries, said the NZ Herald, and welcomed him back to political ‘Opinion’ writing with open arms. Photo: Jason Oxenham NZ Herald.

I was asked a question about Matthew Hooton on Twitter recently, and it got me thinking:

“Hooton crops up time and time again in ‘Dirty Politics’. Who funds him?” (click to view on Twitter)

Who funds Matthew Hooton? Gee, that’s a good question.

Hooton used to run a corporate lobbying/PR firm in Auckland. That’s the basis of the frankly risible NZ Herald disclosure statements on his ‘opinion’ columns (hit jobs, really) which variously describe him as ‘an Auckland-based PR consultant’.

As a quick aside, it’s been amusing watching the NZ Herald progressively whitewashing Hooton’s role as a political agent/operative for the NZ National Party.  These three examples of the ‘disclosure’ published by NZME at the bottom of his hit pieces in the Herald are all from this month. The Herald must think we readers (I’m a subscriber) are idiots.

Noithing to see here folks. How the NZ Herald has chosen to progressively airbrush out Matthew Hooton’s ‘strategic communications’ role with the National Party’s leaders. What? Do they think it might be embarrassing to admit the Herald’s Politics ‘Opinion writer’ was — up until a month ago — a paid Partisan Political Operative? Might that be seen as, gee, a conflict in the lead-up to general election? OK. So let’s not mention it. (These three increasingly opaque disclosure statements all from August 2020, oldest at the top, most recent on bottom. Tsk.)

Anyway, sometime in the last year or so Hooton’s business website exceltium.com went offline.

www.exceltium.com is now a dead parrot

Hooton also shut down his Twitter account, shortly after his campaign to undermine (some would say ‘politically assassinate’) National Party leader Simon Bridges on behalf of Todd Muller was exposed; and just before he went to work for Muller in the Leader of the Opposition’s office.
Continue reading →

The juxtaposition in this screen shot of the ‘NZ Taxpayers Union Inc’ astroturf lobby group receiving a government-funded subsidy makes me chortle

Best known for its sometimes absurd agitprop about government and local council spending, no-one could ever accuse this little band of right wing political activists of intellectual consistency.

Sure, we’re all entitled to put our hand out for government support in times of need. No question about that. But THESE GUYS*? What a joke.

(Except it’s real. Check for yourself: COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Employer Search)

– P

* We’ve discussed them before, here, a little bit.

UPDATE: Thanks to a reader, I’ve now seen this spiel in which the astroturf lobby group admits abandoning ‘idealogical purity’ and its previous “state[ment] on the record that we would never accept taxpayer funding”.

Oh boy.

Like everyone applying for the subsidy, this group would have had to make a declaration that they had experienced, or forecast a 30 percent drop in income. Wow, if so, that happened quick. I guess their donations and sales of souvenirs dried up?

Some useful discussion of this aspect and others, here: sparked by Russell Brown on Twitter (Gosh it would be ironic if this sparked a closer look at this rubbery group’s funding, eh?)

UPDATE 2: This is not a spoof. Well, no more than the whole deceitful schtick the fake/astroturf ‘group’ has run from the beginning. Remember, this is a ‘group’ which runs an opaque (cough) ‘funding model’ (hides its corporate donors and other donors) and has a record of being tardy with fulfilling its public financial reporting obligations as as incorporated society. (As revealed here: Making a pig of it. Jordan Williams has been tardy with his financial reporting obligations).

Anyway, look: a feeble defence, followed by another excellent juxtaposition:

This is not a dress rehearsal

Bill Murray interviewed by Charlie Rose.

Plagiarism, copyright infringement. Potato, potahto.

image: bartastechnologies.com

I’ve had skin in this game in the past, and reason to think about it recently in relation to the actions of local (New Zealand) lobbyists The Maxim Institute* (see Unlikely online bully, Liam Hehir). So a recent discussion caught my eye.

This strikes me as a good working definition:

Defining plagiarism is trickier than you might think, but most of the time we distinguish it from other kinds of copying (allusion, quotation) fairly easily: it’s plagiarism if the copyist hopes no one will notice.

— from an illuminating little essay ‘On Being Plagiarised‘ by Charles Hartman, 2013
hat tip Jack Shafer, via Twitter

Working in news and features, it really doesn’t ‘cost’ a writer much at all to cite a source. But it’s in the creative ‘space’, and politics, and also what’s referred to as ‘original research’ that writers are sometimes tempted to take credit (oh, that phrase!) for the work of others.
No-one’s perfect, including me.

– P

* Speaking of Christians involved in politics, this recent Christianity Today editorial calling for Donald Trump’s ejection from the US Presidency as a ‘profoundly immoral’ and unsuitable person is remarkable and worth a read:
Trump Should Be Removed from Office

Archive [PDF] of Charles Hartman essay at LRB

Archive [PDF] of ‘Trump Should Be Removed from Office’ editorial, Christianity Today 19 Dec 2019

Jordan Williams, Colin Craig podcast series announced

A long running lawsuit between two stupid Auckland men is finally is over.

“Free at last, Free at last, Thank God almighty we are free at last.” ― Martin Luther King Jr.

A long and bitter court feud between former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Jordan Williams has been settled, with an apology and compensation from Williams.
On Tuesday, Craig sent out a press release saying he’d received a full apology and a payment from Williams, after Williams admitted making false allegations about him.
It means a retrial of a case in which Williams accused Craig of defamation will not go ahead.

I well remember when our lawyers, Earl and Ben from Simpson Grierson, explained to me and two of my authors that once we had filed our lawsuit alleging copyright infringement – against recidivist plagiarists who had copied large chunks, word-for-word, from several of our books and articles, then published them as their own work –  the lawyers told us we were said to be ‘engaged’ … and we could only ‘disengage’ by agreement with the parties we were suing, or by a court result.

That felt uncomfortable, and as the mounting expense, the stress, and the shitfight of the litigation escalated, it got really uncomfortable. It also took so long for the foaming guilty party to stop their stupid tub-thumping and own up, make an acceptable settlement offer, to pay damages (any of this sound familiar?) The NZ Herald‘s sardonic business reporter Anne Gibson headlined her story on the end of the legal action: ‘Copyright dispute turns into a saga’. Sigh.

So I have an inkling of the stress these two roosters – Colin Craig and Jordan Williams – have been enduring as this legal fiasco/soap opera has ground on – for years and years. Honestly, I’m relieved and glad for both of them, and their loved ones, that this, at least, is over. I know what an unsatisfactory state of affairs this result must be for them both.

And I don’t like how this development has been reported in some quarters, with an implicit criticism of Colin Craig for using every avenue and opportunity available to him to seek to salvage his burned-beyond-all-recognition reputation from the molten ashes created by a deliberate, concerted, (in my personal opinion, based on what I’ve seen) devious and BAD FAITH smear campaign which aimed to destroy him, and decapitate the Conservative Party.

A page from Colin Craig’s ‘punch back’ booklet ‘Dirty Politics and Hidden Agendas’

I’ve posted before (see ‘About that Jordan Williams damages award…’) how the Katz, J ruling at the end of the Williams v Slater High Court trial [PDF] effectively shredded right wing astroturf lobbyist and dirty politics apprentice Jordan Williams’ own reputation, mainly by coldly documenting his repeated, proven dishonesty.
Judge Katz, who presided over the long and tortured defamation trial – Williams suing Craig pre-emptively (facing threats of a lawsuit the other way) for mean things said about him at a press conference and in a booklet* – issued a catalogue of Jordan’s lies and his deceit, right there in her court decision. Then there were the claims and allegations that were exposed as false and exaggerated, at which Jordan deployed a defence (paraphrased): I claimed things that were untrue, but I did not lie.

Katz, J also quashed the ludicrous award of $1.27 million ‘damages’ issued to Williams by a sympathetic/gullible/hypnotised jury who seemed to regard Jordan as a poor wee choir boy – and judged that he was somehow more defamed than Michael Stiassny ($825,000 in damages) whose defamer set up a dedicated website to unfairly smear him and (if I recall correctly) leased a fricken motorway billboard to tell Aucklanders and visitors to the region what an [alleged] lying [alleged] crook he [allegedly] was. (Yeah, I did recall it correctly, see Siemer loses defamation appeal in Stiassny case):
Continue reading →

Unlikely online bully, Liam Hehir

Check. Check. One, two, three, four. Is this thing ON?

Hello readers, I logged in last night (yeah, it’s been a while) to mark THE END of the landmark legal case, Jordan Williams v Colin Craig, which (gulp) reached The Supreme Court, in which New Zealand’s most-defamed man was suing the politician he set out to destroy, for punching back.
It ended quietly, and thank goodness for all of us, it’s over. (Or is it?)
Anyway, that post is still coming; but in the meantime, something else caught my attention:

Hey. there’s no harm in posting this on the internet. This is just ‘a joke’, eh?

One good ‘joke’ deserves another, a few days later…

Cameron Slater used to pull this shit. He’d fall into a disagreement with somebody online then try to reach into their offline life, or direct his ‘Whale Army’ idiot trolls to go after the person — looking for ‘dirt’ and, if possible, seeking to disrupt their employment or private life etc. Slater, with typical braggadocio and delusion would sometimes bray NFWAB (‘Never Fuck With A Blogger’). Look where that got him, eh? See: Bankrupt blogger Cameron Slater carried out ‘character assassination’ – ordered to pay $70,000 in landmark media ruling (NZ Herald).

I expected better from Liam Hehir, a lawyer who moonlights as a social conservative (i.e. religious right) essayist. Liam used to write a newspaper column and still does for a few websites as well as the ‘Maxim Institute’. That’s an activist Evangelical Christian lobby group disguised as a ‘think tank’ which apparently sources its ‘thinks’ from equally opaquely-named North American-based activist conservative/Christian groups like ‘The Heritage Foundation’ which can be seen as part of what we used to call The Moral Majority. In turn, Maxim can be seen as seeking to promote here in New Zealand what one observer calls ‘American-style religion-based politics’.

The Maxim Institute is still living down various plagiarism scandals from quite a while ago, and (earlier this year) one of its senior figures being caught in the act using a false name in his ‘letters to the editor’ campaign (like, multiple editors, multiple newspapers – see below) against a proposed referendum on assisted suicide for terminally-ill patients. This was, I think aptly described as ‘a particularly devious tactic‘ at the time by the newspaper columnist who uncovered it, Martin Hanson, writing in The Gisborne Times.

Religious dogma cuts very little ice with most people, so they [the Christian activists opposed to euthanasia] have to devise an alternative strategy to avoid any mention of their real motive.
To put it mildly, concocting non-religious arguments has proved challenging, not least, for truth.
A particularly devious tactic has recently come to light in the newspapers. A certain “Stephen Francis” has written letters to The Dominion Post, The Gisborne Herald, The Southland Times, Hawke’s Bay Today, Rodney Times, The Northland Age and most recently The Whanganui Chronicle, all arguing against David Seymour’s End of Life Choice bill.

Anyway, no big thing, OK? but Liam and I fell out on Twitter (hey, it happens. It’s Twitter) over what I saw as a lack of proper disclosure of his roles for the National Party, specifically his work as the electorate chair for the party in Palmerston North some years ago. Look, I’d read and enjoyed maybe half a dozen of his essays and somehow escaped knowing that.

The Spinoff website prominently posted a disclosure (his disclosure) on a recent typically entertaining article by Liam about a 17 year old schoolboy being selected as the National Party candidate for Palmerston North.

Credit to The Spinoff for, I guess, turning Liam’s throwaway disclosure into part of the lead on his ‘opinion’ column, eh? Good on them. But that disclosure surprised me and I said so: Continue reading →

Monica Lewinsky – a long echo of trauma leading to such wisdom

I heard a 45 minute interview with Monica Lewinsky talking to TED’s Chris Anderson on BBC Radio 4 over the weekend, and have listened to it another two times out walking. I recommend it. Highly.

Man, I am so impressed with how this woman has integrated her life experiences and come to an understanding of how to tread a path forward, and share an important message.

It’s here at the BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0007j4f  (I listened on the iPlayer Radio app which us non-UK-based listeners are left to, instead of the BBC Sounds app.)

What she says about the unintended consequences and effects of public shaming via the internet (the web and social media’s ability to shame someone to death) reminded me of this comment, which I shared here in 2015, coincidentally:

On three occasions during my ‘career’ as an online critic and avenging angel I have deliberately pulled back from castigating a ‘target’.
In all three cases, I became concerned at what appeared to me to be the real possibility that the person whose actions and modus operandi I was criticising might do themselves physical harm as a result of the stress they were experiencing in response to my criticism…

If anything, since then, I’ve become more sensitive to this issue, and the risks. And, to a certain extent (but not completely), I’ve lost my appetite for the bombastic calling-out of scumbags.
I have cited this wise saying before: “Don’t argue with an idiot. People watching might not be able to tell the difference.”

See what you get from the interview.

-P

Oh, it’s also well worth watching her 2015 TED Talk. Impressive.

 

“Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop,” says Monica Lewinsky.
In 1998, she says, “I was Patient Zero of losing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously.” Today, the kind of online public shaming she went through has become constant — and can turn deadly. In a brave talk, she takes a hard look at our online culture of humiliation, and asks for a different way.

Archive copy of the TED interview: Monica Lewinsky and Chris Anderson (13MB MP3 file) here.