That’s not copyright theft. It’s ‘intertextual mixing’… (Yeah, right!)

“Ooops, you caught me passing off someone else’s work as my own.”

From The Independent

Shortly after Ms Hegemann’s book appeared, a blogger pointed out that passages of it bore an uncanny similarity to Strobo. In one case a whole page had simply been lifted from Strobo and planted in [her book]. …

“There was really no need for her to copy me,” insisted Airen in an interview with Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine. “But she borrowed entire passages of my dialogue. I feel that my copyright has been infringed.”

In an artful attempt to steal their critics’ thunder Ms Hegemann and her publishers have gone on the offensive. They have managed, in part, to turn what at face value appeared to be a clearcut case of stealing somebody else’s words into a wide-ranging debate about the meaning of plagiarism in the online era. They argue that [her book] is merely an example of modern ” intertextual mixing“. [Comment: Oh. That’s OK, then. Thanks for explaining that. (Not!)]

Interviewed last week about the charges, Ms Hegemann’s defence was simply “I cannot understand what all the fuss is about.” [Comment: Then grow up!]
While she acknowledges that she used numerous “sources” for her book, she also claims that she is a member of a different generation of writers which is used to adapting and using the abundance of information available online for its own creative purposes.

“I remember sentences my friends tell me just as much as I take on the ideas of the Slovenian critical theorist Slavoj Zizek,” she told Der Spiegel, which described her as a “know-all”. “I went everywhere I could find inspiration,” she said about her book, and added:
“There is no such thing as originality anyway, there is just authenticity.”

That last line “There is no such thing as originality anyway…” is pretty easy to say from that side of the equation, don’t you think?

Hey, we’ve all been inspired by other writers, and even consciously or subconsciously adopted something from somebody somewhere… but word-for-word, image-for-image, point-by-point is OUT, unless you say where you got it, in my opinion. Acknowledge your sources.

Let’s call a spade a spade: she’s a plagiarist.
‘Online age’ ‘new generation’ poppycock makes no difference. That blogger published his work, she pinched it (without attribution)… which is exactly what got Witi Ihimaera into so much mal odour.

Case closed.

Another good view of it from Laura Miller at Salon.com:

This would be more plausible if Hegemann had acknowledged from the beginning that she’d included work from other writers in [her book] but by all indications, she did not.

Quite a good quiz

Quiz: prime ministers v the media

From The Guardian

Prime ministers and journalists have often had a difficult relationship. As Lance Price reveals in a new book, Where Power Lies: Prime Ministers v the Media (from which these quotes are taken), the two sides have been criticising each other, in similar terms, for years. This should become clear if you try to work out who said what.

1. Who told the political editor of the Daily Mirror: “The only message the prime minister has for Daily Mirror readers is: don’t buy it”?

• Winston Churchill when Stanley Baldwin was PM
• Brendan Bracken when Winston Churchill was PM
• Bernard Ingham when Margaret Thatcher was PM
• Alastair Campbell when Tony Blair was PM

Bit of a giggle… read on

Keith Olbermann: ‘My Father Asked Me To Kill Him’ (VIDEO)

This is a worthwhile (and pretty tough) lead-in to a conversation about US healthcare reform and the “death panel” lies that are still swirling (fed by lobbyists and cynical attention-seeking politicians) … (via Huffington Post)

“Last Friday night, my father asked me to kill him.”

Keith Olbermann opened his emotional Special Comment on health care Wednesday with the story of his father’s six-month-long hospitalization suffering through a colon removal, pneumonia, kidney failure, liver failure, and many infections.

After a particularly difficult week, Olbermann said he went into his father’s hospital room to find him “thrashing his head back and forth” and mouthing the word “Help.”

“It was just too much for my father,” Olbermann said. “‘Stop this,’ he mouths. ‘Stop, stop, stop.'”

Olbermann said he resorted to gallows humor, asking his father, “What, you want me to smother you with a pillow?” And his father responded, mouthing, “Yes, kill me.”

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I had a similar experience (the urgent request, call, appeal — earnest, full frontal) from someone I cared about very much last year. There were times we just wept at the suffering, wave after wave … all of it frightening, unspeakable, unknowable … until you’re ‘there’.

He’s right. Have the “life” talk sooner rather than later – P

Where the slippery slope of deception ends …

(image: movies.yahoo.com)

(image: movies.yahoo.com)

A scandal is whipping through the internet about a tech reporter/blogger called Randall C. Kennedy who “invented” an alter-ego as an “expert” source for info about a speciality area of computing. He even posed as his fake self when giving interviews to other reporters!

Sucker/innocent victim ComputerWorld writer Gregg Keizer reflects on lies and liars and ‘the slippery slope of deception’ …

One of the more interesting people I’ve talked with in the last two years is a figment of his own imagination.

“Craig Barth,” the chief technology officer of Florida-based Devil Mountain Software, a company that makes and markets Windows performance metrics software, is, I have discovered, nobody. He doesn’t exist.

Barth is, in fact, a nom de plume, which is a fancy, French way of saying “alias.” The real man behind the curtain is Randall C. Kennedy, a popular, sometimes outrageous blogger for and frequent contributor to InfoWorld, a publication that like Computerworld is part of IDG. Kennedy’s connection to InfoWorld was severed on Friday.

The two, Barth and Kennedy, are one and the same. The problem was that I didn’t know that. The problem was that Kennedy didn’t tell me he was Barth, that I didn’t figure out Barth was he, and that together, they were Devil Mountain.

It’s a piece worth reading in its entirety, and a few key points about lies are well made:

Here’s the bare-faced lie:

But on Friday, after I confronted Barth with evidence that linked him to Kennedy — I didn’t yet know they were one and the same — he assured me that although the two had worked together in the past, and in fact, now worked together at Devil Mountain, any allegations that he and Kennedy were the same person were ridiculous. Two hours later, I received an e-mail from Kennedy, who I’d e-mailed separately.

“Time to level with you,” Kennedy wrote. “The individual Craig Barth doesn’t exist. It’s a pseudonym I created a decade ago while writing news copy for Windows NT Magazine. … “What began as a simple e-mail exchange of benchmark data two years ago snowballed, as all such white lies tend to do, into the mess we have today,” he [Kennedy] added.

Lie” it is, “white” it’s not. And “mess” doesn’t begin to describe the fall-out over Kennedy’s disguising his identity to InfoWorld, Computerworld, and other news organizations and blogs, including the Associated Press, WindowsITPro, and Gizmodo.

During every interview with Barth since late 2007, I came away convinced he knew what he was talking about. On Friday, Kennedy claimed that everything but his identity was legit … Obviously, that’s moot now. Readers who scoffed at the data he presented last week have all that much more reason to doubt. Even people who accepted the data as valid, like me, have to wonder where the slippery slope of deception ends.

Yes, it’s like that with liars. Continue reading →

Ace communicator or duplicitous spruiker? (VIDEO)

No_sharks_logo_100 by Peter Aranyi

There are certain ‘sales types’ who veer so close to Con artists and scammers that you wonder why the ‘authorities’ don’t shut the lying bastards down.

Newly-bankrupt Mark Bryers of Blue Chip seems to fit into that category, judging by some of the material I’ve seen privately and from reports in the media and from former Blue Chip employees and licensees.

I’m engaged in a conversation with friends at present about the latest marketing bullshit from someone local who is much less impressive.

These ‘Operators’ are commonly compulsive liars. Any remotely long-term observation of them shows that they just can’t keep their story straight. They drop back to their door-to-door hustler, two-bit salesman roots and end up telling lie after lie after lie … eventually tripping up.

Sadly, some use a born-again-religion smokescreen to disarm their victims. They loudly trumpet their own salvation and new-found ‘ethics’ (‘I was lost but now I’m found’) as a way to draw people into the net. Some use the ‘I was (financially) lame but now I’m healed (rich)’ con. It’s a bit like the ‘misdirection’ trick stage magicians use to cover their sleight-of-hand.

Sometimes they say the exact opposite of the truth, knowing most people don’t expect bare-faced lies. Continue reading →

The very best you can afford …

Apropos of my earlier post ‘More unintended consequences?‘ …

Tom Scott

Tom Scott nails it.

(via Stuff.co.nz)

“Buzz kills privacy” – ooooh!

buzz.jpg

So you don’t like Google Buzz?
Turn it OFF, then, and stop complaining:

Nightmares for Gmail users as Buzz kills privacy – NZ Herald :

“Of course, those still dissatisfied can simply turn off Buzz.
There’s a small link to do so at the bottom of the Gmail inbox page.”

Duh.

UPDATE: – a bit of background spin worth reading at businessinsider.com: How google went into code red and saved google buzz

(See comments for a more jaded view of the whole fiasco.)

“No more lies”

It takes courage to speak up (image: wordle.net)

It takes courage to speak up (image: wordle.net)

Thank goodness there are still people like this in the world …

Bridgecorp staff told to lie to investors, court told

By Edward Gay  NZ Herald Monday Feb 15, 2010

A former staff member of failed finance company Bridgecorp has told the court she and her colleagues were told to lie to angry investors who had not been paid.

Katie Greengrass told the Auckland District Court that it was clear “investors were not being paid”.

She said staff were told to blame the lack of payment on a “banking glitch”.

Greengrass was giving evidence at the depositions hearing against Bridgecorp directors, who each face 10 charges brought by the Securities Commission relating to issuing false prospectuses for the finance company that still owes 14,500 debenture holders $459 million.

…. Greengrass told the court this afternoon that when staff arrived back from their Christmas break in 2007, the phones were ringing.

She said her supervisor went into a meeting with Petricevic before addressing her and her colleagues saying: “OK, ladies, here’s the line.”

Greengrass said she told the colleague: “No more lies” and was sat down in a corner and given another job to do.

“No more lies”. Good for her! That’s taking a stand. More than some would do.

Look, I know it can take a lot to stand up in the face of wrongdoing. My half-jokes about Asperger’s aside, it’s pretty obvious that most people are brought up to ‘please’ others (‘Can’t we all just get along?’)

So raising a hand and saying “Hold on, this isn’t right!” Continue reading →

A lawsuit waiting to happen…

OhMyGosh.

Snapped in Howick...

Snapped in Howick...

Tax? ‘Quite a good idea’…

In New Zealand, there’s been a lot of, umm, ‘debate’ (heat but not much light) about finding a way to tax residential property investors. Much ado about nothing, we hope.

Here’s a brilliant ad in support of a proposed UK tax on banks…

I have one or two people I would like to question in a similar manner about their public claims… watch this space.

Cyber-bullying — and an aftermath

(image: latrobeschool.com)

(image: latrobeschool.com)

One of my early blog posts here at www.ThePaepae.com reflected on Remembering the cyber world is not the real world.

Of course there are exceptions, like the NY model slandered anonymously whom I discussed in Potshots from behind a mask of anonymity are, by definition, cheap:

My view: People need to be accountable for their public statements. Anonymous log-ins tend — in some — to breed a recklessness and nasty damaging discourtesy. And they shouldn’t get away with it. (I still defend the right of whisteblowers to post anonymously — but not personal abuse or lies.)

and here.

Now this: key quote “Some of the comments are clear criminal offences.” Wow.

Charges likely after Christchurch Facebook threats

NZPA 14/02/2010 via stuff.co.nz

People who joined in a vicious online attack against a new Christchurch principal will be prosecuted, police say.

Continue reading →

A three horse race to rule over the global distribution of digital content … Apple in front by a nose.

iPad vs Kindle (image: crunchgear.com)

iPad vs Kindle (image: crunchgear.com)

Worthwhile evaluation from someone who knows the publishing game better than most — and from more angles.

Why Apple’s iPad is shaking things up with Amazon and Google

from Martin Taylor’s e-report — digital publishing downunder

When Apple launched its long-rumoured iPad tablet computer late last month, it fired a major salvo in the battle for control of media in a new digital era. In its global sights were Google and Amazon who, along with Apple, are the companies driving this seismic shift in media.

All three companies are jockeying to be gatekeepers between content providers and consumers. So far, many of these battles have been playing out overseas but in 2010, New Zealanders will get to join in.

It’s the ability to get consumers to pay for digital content and reduce its reliance on a broken online advertising model that is at the heart of the media’s excitement. So it’s not surprising that a lot of the early jostling is for control of the one major medium that’s largely ad-free, books.

With business models that link online stores to specialised gadgets, companies like Apple and Amazon are proving that consumers will pay for music downloads, ebooks and even online newspaper subscriptions if you make it easy and attractive enough.

Continue reading →

Speak up (or shut up) to defend a friend?

I’ve had occasion to reflect on this, one of my habits/traits/addictions: Speaking up for my friends.
And, having thought about it: Yup — I’d do it every time. It’s almost involuntary. (Asperger’s?) I’d hope (but not expect) my friends to do the same for me.

There’s another aspect, too:
A friend of mine was approached by a newspaper reporter asking for a ‘character’ type comment about the son of family friends. The ‘boy’ had fallen on hard times — not completely of his own making, but he DID help topple his house of cards with his unfortunate (OK, let’s call it arrogant) manner. At the time of the journalist’s call he was being publicly pressured and pilloried by the tax authorities, among others

The reporter wanted my friend (who’d employed the ‘boy’ decades earlier) to say something ‘negative’ about him — anything disparaging would have done nicely … but why?

Why kick him when he’s down? Why provide one more lash of opprobrium at a time when his personal life, his business life, his world was creaking under pressure, threatening to blow apart at the seams?

The reporter quizzed my friend about the boy’s liking for luxury cars and penchant for collecting speeding tickets … and my friend muttered something about the boy always being “a good driver” in his company … a comment which (ridiculously) made it into the newspaper in a mangled form. Quite unnecessarily.

The issue is loyalty. Why add to someone’s pain? Just shut up.
But let me be clear: I’m not suggesting collusion or a mafia-like a code of silence (omerta).

Should we ‘cover’ another person’s sin? NO. That makes you an accomplice.

I’m as offended as the next fair-minded person (see what I’m doing there?) at, for instance, the ghastly cover-ups of pedophile priests, police and probation officers, abusive foster parents and negligent social workers.
They need to be exposed. So do the con-artists and spruikers who prey on the vulnerable.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, in those circumstances, and many others.

And exposure, god help us, as painful as it is, is sometimes our best first hope.

For instance, a man I’ve come across, a self-proclaimed paragon of virtue, has things going on in his life that I believe would be terrible for him if they were exposed.
Terrible at one level, but, can I suggest, in another way such exposure could be the saving of him? Continue reading →

Mark Withers on John Key’s ‘Tax Direction’ speech

“3 bullets dodged but there’s still a round in the breech!”
Mark Withers - author of Property Tax - a New Zealand Investor's Guide

Mark Withers - author of Property Tax - a New Zealand Investor's Guide

I had a chat with specialist property accountant Mark Withers this morning — ‘the morning after’ NZ Prime Minister John Key’s speech at the opening of Parliament.

Here’s a free 13 minute audio interview (mp3) hosted by Empower Education.

And here’s a link to the Withers-Tsang website for their client update

(Mark is the author of Property Tax – A New Zealand Investor’s Guide.)

UPDATE: You can listen to it here via a new plugin:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

More iPad preamble – “a clear window into the software”

“People who are focussed on the hardware are missing  the key thing: – software and services” – Walt Mossberg  Wall St Journal

“One thing you have to understand about this gadget is that the gadget disappears pretty quickly. You’re looking into pure software.”  – David Carr  NY Times

On the Amazon Kindle: “It looked like something the Mennonites made 150 years ago.” – Carr

23 minutes worth watching:

Great quote: “Is this a bridge to the future or a gallows for us?”

From Brainstorm Tech blog