Johnny Dankworth RIP

Johnny Dankworth (1927-2010) [image: nme.com]

Johnny Dankworth (1927-2010) image: nme.com

Jazz legend Johnny Dankworth dies aged 82

BBC 7 Feb 2010

Sir John Dankworth, a mainstay of the British jazz scene for over 60 years, has died.
Saxophonist Sir John, 82, served as musical director to the likes of Nat King Cole and Ella Fitzgerald.
Sir John, known as Johnny, died in a London hospital on Saturday. He had been ill for several months.
His wife, the singer Dame Cleo Laine, announced his death at a concert at their Buckinghamshire theatre, where she was performing with their children.
The concert on Saturday was celebrating 40 years of the theatre, which the couple founded in the grounds of their home in Wavendon.
Dame Cleo broke the news to the artists before the concert began but did not tell the 400-strong audience until the finale. (continues…)

Farewell Johnny. You made a mark. You were the soundtrack of generations.

Doctrinaire aggression vs physical aggression

Wole Soyinka: On origins of religious strife…

In Mr. Soyinka’s view, the origins of the current phase of the world’s religious strife—including all of the bloodshed in Nigeria—lie with Ayatollah Khomeini and his fatwa against Salman Rushdie, in 1989.
“It all began when he assumed the power of life and death over the life of a writer. This was a watershed between doctrinaire aggression and physical aggression. There was an escalation. The assumption of power over life and death then passed to every single inconsequential Muslim in the world—as if someone had given them a new stature.

“Al Qaeda is the descendent of this phenomenon. The proselytization of Islam became vigorous after this. People went to Saudi Arabia. Madrassas were established everywhere.”

The ‘British problem’

England is a cesspit. England is the breeding ground of fundamentalist Muslims. Its social logic is to allow all religions to preach openly. But this is illogic, because none of the other religions preach apocalyptic violence. And yet England allows it. Remember, that country was the breeding ground for communism, too. Karl Marx did all his work in libraries there.

From The Daily Beast

Worth reading. A different spin on our discussion The overblown role of religion in conflict

The rise (and fall) of the value of online advertising

Following a report on Apple boss Steve Jobs pitiching the iPad distribution channel to NY newspaper chiefs…

The highlighted bit (see below) about online advertising space being (a) infinite in supply and therefore (b) valueless accords with my thinking (although I am not a genius, nor all that experienced).

I’ve done some online advertising and direct marketing, and it seems to me that even when advertising in a ‘targeted’ space, where ‘viewers’ are supposedly pre-selected to have demonstrated interest in your type of offering, ads are still seen as an interruption, or ‘a necessary evil’. (Do I sound cynical? Well, maybe. Just an observation.)

(Image: Paul Newman — The Australian, 1 May 2007)

(Image: Paul Newman — The Australian, 1 May 2007)

I recently saw banner ads in a discussion forum provoke a barrage of negative word-of-mouth about the advertiser and its offering — so much so that had I been the advertiser I would have regretted placing the ads. The cacophony of derision just went on and on and on … picking holes in the ‘offer’ and the ad wording, castigating the advertiser, the hosting website, questioning the legality of the whole thing — eventually uncovering what looked like plagiarism in the ‘offer’ and prompting a quick ‘site-down-switcheroo-site-up’ revision.

Now even looking on the bright side, the adage ‘there’s no such thing as bad publicity’ isn’t, literally, true. Oh no. I’m pretty sure that was a negative experience from a ‘marketing’ point of view — shooting yourself in the foot, even — although good feedback that the ‘offer’ wasn’t ready for prime time, so not without value. Continue reading →

Apple’s iPad: “a replacement for computing”

“The iPad isn’t the future of computing; it’s a replacement for computing.”

— Mike Monteiro, muledesign.com

(image: Mike Monteiro muledesign.com)

(image: Mike Monteiro muledesign.com)


A vision of the future….

As many others have noted, the release of the iPad might be the cannonball into the consumer device pool the iPhone dipped its toes in. It’s also been referred to as a thing that sits between that iPhone and your laptop.

I see it as more of a fork in the road. It’s the thing many people will get INSTEAD of a laptop. read on

Yeah, mon! What he said.
It’s a game-changer.

“Bringing a large dose of common sense into the equation…”

Somebody thinking clearly about the internet copyright ‘three strikes, you’re disconnected’ proposals: An Australian judge has ruled that ISP iiNet is not responsible for its customers breaking copyright laws.

(Of course it will be appealed!)

Aussie ISP strikes landmark blow in copyright war

By Pat Pilcher NZ Herald Thursday Feb 4, 2010

Aussie ISP iiNet has won a landmark case over service providers’ responsibilities when it comes to handling copyright-protected material.

The case kicked off in the Australian Federal Court in October, between internet service provider iiNet, and AFACT (the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft).

AFACT accused iiNet of authorising ‘torrent’ downloads by not acting on known copyright infringements by its subscribers.

In what is likely to represent a blow to attempts to crack down on copyright infringing downloads, Judge Cowdroy has ruled that iiNet are not guilty.

… Bringing a large dose of common sense into the equation, Judge Cowdroy stated that iiNet has no control over BitTorrent and cannot be held responsible for the actions of its subscribers. continues

I get as worked up about copyright infringement as anybody else, but it’s crazy to direct sillyness at the ISPs instead of tackling BitTorrent. It’s like blaming the photocopy machine.

These things are going to change.

More unintended consequences?

How’s this for taking things a leetle bit too far… (It makes a good point though.)

Did the US Supreme Court consider that by ruling the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections (on the basis that it’s a ‘free speech’ right!) that it was, in effect, giving corporations ‘human rights’? … like standing for election? Ha! It didn’t occur to me.

Best lines:
“It’s our democracy. We bought it, we paid for it, and we’re going to keep it.”
“The way we see it, Corporate America has been the driving force in Congress for years — but now it’s time we got behind the wheel ourselves.”
“Now that democracy is truly for sale, Murray Hill Incorporated is offering top dollar.”

Corporation Says It Will Run for Congress

Continue reading →

Social media as high school reunion

(image: istockphoto via Salon.com)

(image: istockphoto via Salon.com)

What they didn’t know, and never could’ve predicted, was that the Web would also transform itself into an enormous, never-ending high school reunion (See also: hell).

… Let’s see, so the digital revolution led us all to this: a gigantic, commercial, high school reunion/mall filthy with insipid tabloid trivia, populated by perpetually distracted, texting, tweeting demi-humans. Yes, the information age truly is every bit as glorious and special as everyone predicted it would be!”

From Heather Havrilesky’s well-written and worth-reading preview of “Digital Nation”: What has the Internet done to us? on PBS Salon.com

That’s a good point, about the endless high school reunion — as anyone who’s had the odd surprising (and slightly uncomfortable?) blast-from-the-past Facebook ‘friend’ invitations can attest. Icky, some of them. Just.Not.Right.

See the full article at Salon.com for some good discussion of  the subject of ‘What has all this distraction and distractibility done to us?Continue reading →

The state of the media

Oh, this is very funny … a true spoof. The cliches fall like autumn leaves. (Pwah!)

I have a serious book somewhere called Bending Reality: The state of the media (James Curran) which, among other things, discusses the compromises and distortions those in the news media routinely can and do make in the effort to ‘package’ the news. Sometimes the effect is to tell the exact opposite of what’s truly happening. It happens all the time. Continue reading →

One smart person

“Elisabeth Murdoch touts social networking”

CEO says youths willing to pay for premium experiences
By Elizabeth Guider The Hollywood Reporter Jan 27, 2010,

LAS VEGAS — Emphasizing the need for the TV industry to put on its “hard hats” and rebuild the biz for a new era, Elisabeth Murdoch offered up a blueprint which put social networking at the heart of the solution for successful content.

Addressing participants at the annual NATPE confab in Vegas Wednesday morning, the Shine-Reveille CEO cautioned that broadcasters can’t afford any longer to ignore “the profound paradigm shift” which has overtaken the audience in the last decade. The biggest upheaval in media has less to do with the fall-off in advertising or the broken broadcast model as with how people are now actually consuming content of all kinds.

With some recent stats at her fingertips, Murdoch argued that the younger generation — in Europe, America, wherever — is both watching TV and using their computers at the same time. They’re also eating, Web surfing, doing their homework and chatting simultaneously, and are highly engaged and quite willing to interact with high quality, involving content, Murdoch said.

Moreover, and this was one of the keys of her keynote, they are also increasingly willing to pay for premium experiences. She pointed to some of the experiments with social gaming as in Pet Society and Farmville as experiences that provide for a paid tier. …

continues

OK, leave aside that last bit about Pet Society and Farmville (ugh, the scourge of Facebook?) but Ms Murdoch has a point. And the stats and self-interest to back it up, I’m sure. Continue reading →

RIP JD Salinger

J.D. Salinger (1919-2010)

J.D. Salinger (1919-2010)

“There is a marvelous peace in not publishing,” J.D. Salinger told The New York Times in 1974. “Publishing is a terrible invasion of my privacy. I like to write. I love to write. But I write just for myself and my own pleasure.”

Farewell.

The New Yorker has made his stories available. Good on them.

iPad? Yeah. OK, probably. Why not?

Apple iPad - launched today amid typical hype and fanfare

Apple iPad - launched today amid typical hype and fanfare

Yes, I’ll probably get one of these. It looks useful, and some of the applications seem like an improvement. Apple does lead the world in industrial design (the ‘cool’ factor), and this shows it again. An e-book reader should have a high quality colour screen, in my opinion.

Is it a ‘game-changer’, as pundits are saying?

Yes, I think so, probably — with the iTunes, App Store and now iBooks store … yes.
I expect to see subscriptions to Murdoch’s papers and a bunch of other online media. Apple’s gravitational pull (the ‘goldrush’ they talk about) will make them an attractive ‘channel’.

The future of online distribution is (almost) here. Continue reading →

Unintended consequences

How to leave a discussion forum.

How to leave a discussion forum.

A fair minded person seeks to put themselves in the other person’s shoes … I find myself doing that more and more. (… and I’m not saying, ‘Aren’t I wonderful?’ by that comment, I assure you.)

I would hate for some of the things I’ve said about the activities and behaviour of others to be said about me — that’s why I don’t do what they do. And I acknowledge wisdom in the maxim: Choose your enemies carefully because you will become like them.

As discussed here in ‘Slave to consistency’ I recently observed someone I like being smeared, repeatedly, ignorantly, by people who hadn’t taken the time to find out their target’s side of the story. That’s how it looked to me, so I spoke up in my friend’s defence.

A few days later the law of unintended consequences kicked in….

Continue reading →

Talking with Dave: thoughts about media blur

I’m part way through an online conversation with Dave, who I like, about hyperbolic opinion pieces masquerading as news (what I call the Glenn Beck/Fox News effect). We’re discussing Dave’s frustration with the “blur” between news and opinion. Dave said:

I wouldn’t mind if the media did genuinely report as an opinion piece. At least you’d know where you stood with them then. Now we have media hyping things up purely to suit their own promotional interests and if people aren’t alternatively informed about the issue in question, they have no idea what is really going on. News has become entertainment.

To which I say, you’re in danger of demonising a generalisation, Dave, like “they” should do something about that, “the gummint” should stamp out litter, or “this is a Christian country” …

“The media” is an indefinable entity made up of individuals chasing “success” (in my view) — motivated by myriad things, but mostly, in my observation, a desire for relevance (“notice me, listen to me, respect me!!”) There’s a commercial, competitive element too, which cannot be ignored.

From a background as a political journalist, I worked as part of a very small team that produced a top rating (i.e.#1) radio news show in Auckland for 5 years. It was #1 when I arrived and #1 when I left. (whew!)

I know the pressures we felt to “rate” — to keep our precarious position at the top of the greasy pole. I also know something of the efforts our competitors made to knock us off (in both senses: copy & displace) and their frustration at not being able to do so.

Our #1 spot (not the only one held by shows at the station, I hasten to add) was worth a great deal of money in advertising revenue to the station, actually to the network. In a quick decision world, it was easy for advertisers and agencies to decide to place their budgets with our station — being #1 in the ‘key demographics’ meant we had an attractive audience.

But we weren’t whores. Continue reading →

Nothing new under the sun…

Apparently Scarlett Johansson is playing ‘Black Widow’ in the movie sequel to Iron Man.
Cool.

Black Widow (Natalia Romanova, also known as Natasha Romanoff)

Of course, she’s very Emma Peel from The Avengers isn’t she?

Diana Rigg as Emma Peel

Diana Rigg as Emma Peel

All good clean fun.

Slave to ‘consistency’

(image: Glass House Ministries)

(original image: Glass House Ministries)

One of my favourite ‘let me off the hook’ quotes expressing wisdom is this:

Do I contradict myself?

Very well then I contradict myself,

(I am large, I contain multitudes.)

‘Song of Myself’ — Walt Whitman, US poet (1819 – 1892)

I have at various times, to my cost, roasted myself on a bed of burning coals by the name of ‘consistency’.

Why?

Well, partly because I was brought up with the old saying ‘What’s good for the goose is good for the gander’ — that, and a dose of trying to be the same person in all circumstances (i.e. my personal pursuit of sincerity and integrity — words I barely utter in public because to do so, in my observation, seems to mark one out as just the opposite.)

My thoughts about this are prompted today by the unholy sight of a smear campaign under way on a forum I visit. To compound things, the chief protagonist in this case is a creature who — falsely in my personal view — trumpets the superiority of his own ethics every chance he gets. Indeed, he’s recently adopted such a claim as part of the latest positioning statement for his, um, enterprise. Continue reading →