Getting a narrative going

How 3News ran the quote (click to read)

Sometimes, especially in an election campaign, the political reporter’s role is to stand out of the way and let the protagonists slug it out. Really, all we need do in some circumstances is let them say what it is they’ve prepared, report it accurately, and let the public decide.

Like most people, I’ve never seen John Key’s balls (and I don’t want to) … but it seems to me Phil Goff’s attention-seeking comment is aimed directly at the risk-averse incrementalism approach National has taken in government … despite what some point to as bold claims of brave and principled ‘leadership’ in Key’s 2008 election campaign.

Some lay this poll-driven timidity and hesitancy at campaign manager Steven Joyce’s feet. My own view is he’s not alone. It’s natural after nine years in Opposition to be transfixed by an urge: to-not-want-to-screw-it-up.

Another factor, surely, in the Key government’s arguably ‘cautious’ performance has been the series of once-in-lifetime, larger than life situations and disasters thrust upon the country. They, surely, would give anyone pause.

How the NZ Herald saw the same nugget (click)

It will be interesting to see how far the Labour message: ‘Labour haft more mmmm political courage’ line goes. It may strike a chord. Parties in Opposition really do have the luxury of speaking from principle … without much fear of being held to account — and fair enough too. There have to be some perks for losing an election!

Let’s admit this: pulling the ‘Raise the retirement age’ debate out right now DOES seem pretty bold of Labour. So does floating a Capital Gains Tax.

Electorally attractive? Hmmm Dunno. Not likely.

But, like the Mana Party — at least they’re emphasizing a point of difference with these policies. And getting talked about.

– P

Steve Jobs’ biographer talks to Jon Stewart

Nice.

Playing whack-a-mole with ‘da media’

‘Da media’ cops a lot of flak. I heard someone complaining on the radio today about the saturation coverage of the Rugby World Cup … every possible angle explored and elaborated upon.

image: gracedependent.com

Those who work in news and its many-fangled tributaries make a big fat juicy target. Generic criticism rains down on them. It’s instructive to see how many-sided the criticism and contempt for the media can be. e.g. consider just one axis:

The ‘Liberal media’ vs the ‘Corporate media’. It’s the sellf-same ‘entity’ … just with critics coming from different perspectives.

Here’s a line from a fine NY Times article I recommend you read, Images of Libya from a Fallen Photographer

He was upset at how some photographers presented the rag-tag rebels as heroic fighters, when in fact they were sometimes “kind of a joke.” Those pictures, he said, might win prizes, but not his respect.
“We have to fight making propaganda,” he said to me one night at dinner. “The media has become such a part of the war machine now that we all have to be conscious of it more than ever before. ”

I’ve learned to be cautious of the easy use of the term ‘In fact …’ but I respect (the late) photo-journalist Tim Hetherington, and yeah, I know what he means about the fourth estate — a worry about it slipping into a cheerleader role instead of the necessary watchdog role demanded of us.

But in my view and experience, as I have expressed before, ‘The media’ is just people and ‘The media’ results from an endless cascade of decisions made by people.

Sure, groupthink can emerge

In situations less extreme than the one Tim Hetherington was in (embedded with US troops) pressure or influence (both subtle and gross) can come to bear … a point-of-view can emerge. But, in my view, there is no monolithic, universal view. People in ‘The media’ disagree all the time, and often they’re competing. Indeed, as the profile reports, Hetherington’s own work provoked conflicted reactions…

While Tim was shooting the stills for “Infidel,” he simultaneously filmed the movie “Restrepo,” arguably the most complex and intimate war documentary ever made. I believe the film reached more Americans than any other journalistic work to emerge from the war, and serves as a touchstone for future documentarians. Adored and loathed in equal measures by anti-war activists and Pentagon brass, the movie helped create a national conversation about the forgotten war.

Adored and loathed in equal measures.

There can be a kind of received wisdom approach to what issues ‘matter’ or are ‘newsworthy’ or what ‘the facts’ (ahem) are. A lot of the time these are trivial decisions. Sometimes it’s super-easy to decide: natural disasters, manmade disasters, big sporting events … and then there’s more edgy stuff.

Consider the apparent reluctance of some in ‘The media’ to cover/question justifications for the recent US imperial adventures and wars of invasion (see what I’m doing there?) Or the apparent cognitive retardation of otherwise smart commentators to discern what the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protest and its copycats were actually trying to highlight.

People working in the news media can sometimes be afraid to stand out, or buck the trend. Literally afraid. They can be reluctant to be seen to adopt a ‘position’ — or even ask questions of ‘the powers that be’ which might see them tagged them as biased (or, really, ‘un-neutral’). Continue reading →

Green Gorilla: What? No authorisation statement?

OMG, don’t let Cameron Slater see this! After last week’s brain fart he might blow a gasket. I don’t know exactly which Green Party candidate it’s promoting — who is the ‘Green Gorilla’? Does anyone know? Russel Norman?
Bu-bu-but I couldn’t see an authorisation statement anywhere!

Gee, they’re cunning, those Greens. Very cunning …

Spotted in Howick today, but I think they're scattered ALL OVER THE CITY! Cunning Green devils. {snort} (pic: Peter Aranyi)

– P

Iconic graphic spreads

Family back from visiting Thailand earlier this week brought me back these images based on the iconic interpretation of the Apple logo to mark Steve Jobs’ passing.

I read the guy who developed the graphic Jonathan Mak Long‘s humble ‘I’m not sure if I’m first with this idea…’ message when he published it … and sure enough, there’s a little controversy. NBD.

– P

Phew!

image: Paul Estcourt NZ Herald

The All Blacks held on in a tough, tense final against ‘old bogey’ France.

Well done to Richie McCaw, Graham Henry and the team.

– P

Update: front of the NY Times

click to read New York Times coverage

 

Dodgem or dipstick? The miraculous rehabilitation of Chris Trotter from scheming Labour flunky to honourable lefty

image: insideout.topshop.com

David Lange once described Mike Moore as not so much having a train of thought but ‘Dodgems of thought‘. In a way it was a compliment, because Moore was unquestionably an ideas man — he generated lots of ideas. Ideas spilling over each other. The trouble was, as someone who I can’t remember said, that he couldn’t readily distinguish between the good ones and the bad ones.

I was reminded of Lange’s ‘Dodgems of thought’ phrase this week when I observed a right wing blogger smear a political commentator who I respect Chris Trotter as a Labour ‘flunky’. Cameron Slater named Chris Trotter as [allegedly] part of a ‘scurrilous’, unethical Labour plot to spread [allegedly] unsavory rumours about former National Party cabinet minister, reborn as an ACT Epsom electorate MP John Banks.

Labour’s smear tactics in Epsom by Whaleoil on October 21, 2011
There is some pretty scurrilous stuff happening in Epsom, serious muck-raking and innuendo being shopped to the media, even Trevor Mallard is trying to spread it along with other flunkies like Martyn Bradbury and Chris Trotter.
It seems that Labour, bereft of any other ideas are hell bent on trying to undermine ACT as a strategy. Little do they know that ACT is quite capable of doing that all by themselves. However it is apparent that there is a concerted Labour strategy in play now to attack ACt [sic] at every opportunity. Mallard is blogging and Tweeting endlessly about it, their lap-blogs are likewise talking it up, their media proxies are busy talking about polls and all of it focussed on Epsom and ACT.

Wow! Setting aside the cringe-making Waaaaaaaah! factor and Cameron’s vicarious persecution complex (‘a concerted Labour strategy in play’, ‘media talking about polls’, ‘OMG Mallard is blogging & tweeting’ — Hello? You know there’s an election coming up?) and the hypocritical hand-wringing about ‘lap-blogs’ (pfft! Can you hear yourself, you poodle?) … the eyebrow-raising part of Cameron’s fevered rant was this:

He claimed Chris Trotter was [allegedly] in cahoots and scheming with Martyn Bradbury and Trevor Mallard. That’s a new twist, I must say. Chris Trotter? A conspiracy? With those two? That’s surprising. For reals?

Nek Minnit …

A Clarification by Whaleoil on October 22, 2011
Yesterday I posted about Labour’s dirty tactics in Epsom. In the opening paragraph I mentioned Chris Trotter. I have now removed it.
I have had an offline chat and clarified some details and am now satisfied that Chris Trotter remains in my mind as an honourable lefty. He is a person I respect and can share a beer a with and someone who’s opinions I enjoy even though I may not agree with the politics of opinions. …

Oops.
So, in the space of a day on Planet Slater Chris Trotter has gone from a scheming ‘Labour flunky’ to ‘an honourable lefty, a person I respect and can share a beer a with’.

Gee. Go off half-cocked much, Cameron?

Fixation and an addiction to conspiracy theory can actually make you indistinguishable from a Dipstick. It’s like I said in Be careful what you believe

… Right Wing spin doctors and bloggers/activists/schemers like him [Cam Slater] … have convinced themselves that their Left Wing ‘opponents’ are waging a dirty, unprincipled propaganda war and will stoop to virtually any sleazy strategy to gain influence or advantage. So strongly do they, as a group, hold this belief that they (the Right-wing cabal) feel they are therefore completely justified in waging a dirty, unprincipled propaganda war and to stoop to virtually any sleazy strategy to gain influence or advantage. I bet some on ‘the Left’ think exactly the same way. (Trevor Mallard, I’m looking at you. And you Martyn Bradbury.)

As for ‘the media talking about polls’ … crikey. B*stards. What next?

A retraction? Will wonders never cease?

It’s nice to see there are apparently circumstances where Cameron Slater will actually retract his false and misleading statements … so far as I’m aware, he hasn’t yet done so in the two recent BS conspiracy allegations I highlighted: Labour’s [alleged] secret agent blogger/commentator and the ‘Green Party’ post-it note ‘vandalism’ plot against the National Party ACT Party candidate in Epsom John Banks.

But one can hope, I guess. We are, after all, learning organisms.

– P

Images of death in the street

When I was a boy I had a school friend whose dad had been a Kiwi solder in North Africa and Italy during WW2. All the time I knew him, my friend’s dad, (let’s call him Charlie), worked at the Ngauranga meat works north of Wellington.

I learned in a ‘when in Rome’ fashion that my friend and his family would from necessity creep around their house on the weekends, trying not to disturb Charlie … to avoid incurring the lash of his fragile temper.

Most weekends, Charlie would plant himself in a chair in his small living room — sometimes in front of the TV or radio, sometimes with the newspaper or other reading matter, always with a wooden crate of beer flagons beside him.

A crate held five flagons. A flagon was two pints or 1.2 litres of beer. Five foot nothing Charlie would sit there and drink glass after glass until he’d drained all six litres of beer… or until he passed out trying.

So he would routinely drink himself into a stupor, passing through raucous, belligerent, and then quiet patches. Eventually he would slump in his chair, his Brylcreamed head lolling over his white singlet and grey strides.

Often we would make ourselves scarce, but if at home, my friend and I would listen for the sound of Charlie’s snores and sneak a look. My friend would sometimes steal some tobacco from his dad’s pouch in those circumstances.

One afternoon, Charlie had passed out and my friend I snuck like skulking hyenas into the lounge. By appearances, Charlie had been looking through an old chocolate box of small black and white photos which lay on his lap. Some of the curling pictures were scattered on the side table and on the floor around him.

A furtive look at the small but sharp prints revealed they were snaps from the war — pictures of dark haired bronzed soldiers dressed in ill-fitting uniforms squinting into the camera, some on deck, some arranged in front of various North African or Italian landmarks, I guessed. I flicked through some more of them and came across photos of bodies — men and women in civilian clothing lying dead in the street. Then there were some of people — civilians again — strung up, hanging from telephone poles or impaled on what looked like iron fence railings.

Who were these people? What had they done to merit execution in this fashion and this grotesque public display of their corpses? Why did Charlie have photos of them?
I never had the opportunity (or courage) to ask him.

It seemed the images were significant to him, since he had kept them and was reviewing them all these years later (in the late 1960s.)

It’s said there was a lot of undiagnosed and unaddressed clinical depression and what we would now label PTSD – post traumatic stress disorder – among WW2 veterans and combatants.

Looking back with adult eyes, I bet Charlie was processing his wartime experience for decades, while his wife and his two boys paid the price for the psychological damage he sustained. Walking wounded.

I was prompted to remember this today when someone tweeted a picture of Muammar Gaddafi lying dead.

20111021-145657.jpg
Images like this are more commonplace now, and I can see why it’s been reproduced in this case. (I don’t celebrate his death.)

But it did make me think of my friend’s dad … and the impact witnessing death in the street had on him.

– P

Put yourself in her shoes

This is worth reading … Naomi Wolf: how I was arrested at Occupy Wall Street. It demonstrates something I’ve seen — police becoming fixated with ‘keeping order’, and applying strong-arm tactics to people who are not their normal clientele, and will inevitably apply ‘scrutiny’ to their civil-rights-cramping actions.

I’ve been caught by this myself, and from experience, it’s instructive all round. The police learn they can’t just push everyone around like the battered souls they encounter every day. Sickly white liberals (like me) work out they’re bloody lucky not to be police officers themselves, and to have people willing to do the dirty work … and that sometimes the saying ‘You can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs’ has wider applications.

When we brush up against police restricting our civil rights, we tend to bristle, and challenge it. But sometimes the machine is bigger than us and we get caught up in the flywheel … unaccustomed to the routine trampling of our dignity which can be the norm for people repeatedly dealing with the police. (Because they’re crims.)

Ms Wolf’s story also shows the give-an-inch-take-a-mile latitude that makes me reluctant to extend police/security powers. Sometimes, as we’ve seen recently here in NZ, the ‘but they’re real bad buggers’ justification is trotted out to boost powers (covert video surveillance in the latest instance, firearms, tasers) … but then the powers are deployed inappropriately, unguardedly, against people who aren’t terrorists, gang members or P-smugglers … like, say, left wing or religious-based social activists.

We put more tools at the disposal of the state/security apparatus … but who watches the watchers? Not everyone whose rights are abused turns out to be a writer for the New York Times.

– P

Priorities

I spoke to Adam Feeley, the head of the Serious Fraud Office yesterday about the conspiracy charges the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption had just laid against the unsuccessful Crafar farm bidders, particularly May Wang,

He told me the charges resulted from 16 months of work by a dedicated SFO team, co-operating with the ICAC, gathering evidence here in NZ about [alleged] criminal activities targeting Hong Kong Chinese investors.

That team obviously worked to make the charges ‘stick’. (In journalism we talk about making the story ‘stand up’.) It can be touch and go, just to get to the point of having enough evidence of intent and actions to make a case. (Innocent until proven guilty, sure. But there seemed to be something fishy about that whole Natural Dairy (New Zealand) Holdings Ltd business.)

It made me think of the storm surrounding Feeley about a $70 bottle of plonk which may or may not have belonged to Bridgecorp.

What actually matters?

– P

Putting fuel on the fire

Enough with the sheep jokes, already!

As a Kiwi with Australian friends, I’ve had plenty of opportunity to be a good sport over so-called ‘jokes’ about New Zealanders and sheep. (Example: “Q: How do NZ’ers practice safe sex? A: They paint an ‘X’ on the back of sheep that bite.”)

Especially when I’m visiting the Lucky Country, I try to take a good-natured attitude to the ribbing … and gently give a little back: “The Kiwi reached the immigration desk at Collangatta airport and was asked, ‘Do you have any criminal convictions?’ to which replied, ‘I’m sorry, I didn’t think you still needed one of those to get into Australia.”

Sheepishly acknowledged? Wan't there another way to say it, Audrey?

Anyway, I spotted this article PM backtracks on downgrade talk in the NZ Herald online (I hadn’t read it at the time): Audrey Young writing about NZ Prime Minister John Key revealing the basis for his ‘reporting’ in Parliament an expression of Standard & Poor’s rating agency’s [alleged, and since denied] attitude towards a change of government. (See my post: Hansard can be a real bitch, eh Mr Key? for background.)

Prime Minister John Key sheepishly acknowledged yesterday that he had only second-hand information about what ratings agency Standard & Poor’s allegedly said about Labour at a meeting in Auckland.

And it wasn’t what he claimed in Parliament it had said. …

‘Sheepishly’? Oh, please, Audrey. We don’t to give the Aussies any more ammo.

– P

Choked? Who? The Aussies?

I hesitate to say anything that might remotely jinx the All Blacks next weekend against France in the Rugby World Cup final … I had the opportunity to wish All Blacks coach Graham Henry the best of luck in person today, so like a schoolboy, I did.

This is from the foot of a rather unkind article in the Sydney Morning Herald: “Great hope of rugby fumbles and bumbles when he was needed most” which rips into Wallabies number 10 Quade Cooper. Oh dear.

Choked?

One in five respondents think the Wallabies choked - SMH

Go All Blacks.

– P

Birds of a feather part 2

Ha!

A couple of days ago, I commented how a google search led me to a website offering training courses in pick up lines for women … and, judging by the ads on the site, punters in the market for that valuable, um, service also appear interested in paying to learn Gambling tips.

Today I dropped over to TUAW.com (The Unofficial Apple Weblog) a website I follow, looking for more tips and features of Apple’s new iOS5 which I installed the other day … and LOOK what’s at the bottom — in the ‘You might like…’ space on two consecutive posts…

Spotted the theme? (I’ve added a red box.) What does that tell us? Yep.

Geeks like bikini shots! {snort!}

Know your audience. TUAW seems to have worked out geeks want a bit of ... light relief from their geeking. I guess.

You can’t argue with the science.

– P

Whale Oil truth FAIL? A note to the Standards Committee

Ms Spanish Bride
Standards Committee
Whale Oil website

Dear Spanish,

Thank you for your correspondence of 15 October received yesterday ‘Hypocrite, your name is Peter’ which followed my requests for True Blogger Cameron Slater to advance a single shred of evidence for his allegations of ‘illegal’ campaign advertising and ‘vandalism’ which I quote below.
In light of your note, I felt I should respond to you directly.

Cameron blogged:

Green coloured post-it notes on a John Banks campaign hoarding - but does that mean 'the Green Party is breaching electoral law'? Outraged John Banks supporter and National Party blogger Cam Slater says it does — but failed to supply any evidence for his smear when asked. (Pic: Cameron Slater)

The Green party has been caught astro-turfing, their candidate in Hamilton got the sack for lying to a newspaper and now in Epsom they are attacking billboards of John Banks with illegal stickers. [Comment: This bold statement appears to have NO basis in fact.]
It looks like the Green Party is being advised on electoral law by the Labour party. [Neither does this.]

Here is a shot I took this afternoon on the corner of Market Road and Great South Road. They have covered John banks’ (sic) sign with little green stickers. [“They”? The Green Party? Prove it.]

A close up shows Green messages, with no authorisation statements in clear breach of electoral law. [Breach perhaps, but by the Green Party? Cam Slater can apparently offer NO evidence for that serious allegation.] Not to mention the vandalism of another candidates (sic) sign.  [What a very poor example of ‘political blogging’ this is.]

As I conveyed to Cam in a comment on his blog post, by coincidence I observed apparently the same John Banks Market Road campaign hoarding adorned with post-it notes within hours of his photographing it last Friday afternoon …

Peter A:
I don’t think it was the Green Party, Cameron. Continue reading →

Good luck for tonight … Go the All Blacks

Coming up to make or break time...