Political pressure

On the giving end…

Tom Scott nails it between Bollard and John Key

Tom Scott nails it on the relationship between the Reserve Bank Governor and the Government of the Day.

On the receiving end ... pressure is mounting on Mr Popularity to pay the price of his coalition …

Click to read this propaganda (PDF)

… or not.

Has John Key got sufficient political capital?

Or has he been writing cheques the National-led coalition government can’t cash?

We’ll see.

The campaign against the legislation has certainly taken a personal, anti-John Key turn. e.g. ‘Four things you can do to stop him’, ‘Tell your friends what Key is up to’ ‘Three steps you can take to help stop John Key privatising our coastline’ etc.

Ask yourself: Is this government policy or not? Of course it is. Has cabinet approved the draft legislation? Of course. Therefore, isn’t the headline “He’s[i.e. John Key’s] about to trade …” misleading from the start? Er…

I find it interesting to see the (throughly fair-minded, I’m sure) graphics people at the Coastal Coalition choose to dress Prime Minister John Key in a chiefly korowai (feather cloak) and waving the Tino rangatiratanga flag commonly associated with Maori independence.

I don’t suppose they mean it as a compliment. They seek to denigrate him with these symbols. And they seek to appeal to an anti-Maori sentiment … and distrust.

It’s revealing that they must think that’s their most effective angle of attack.
It says a lot, doesn’t it? About the ‘Coastal Coalition’ and their picture of us.

When the rules change, everyone goes back to the start

Quite a nice followup to my earlier post about e-books changing the publishing/bookselling industry, and notes from Mark Coker.

Booksellers: Why Publishers Will Go Direct by Martin Taylor.

Quite simply, no one believes that Random House has any more influence over the digital supply chain than a brand new start-up with minimal staff or track record.

Yeah. That’s how it is, y’all. The internet is a great leveller.

When authors prise their electronic rights away from their brick-and-morter (paper, ink & glue?) rights, all bets are off. But, still, I wouldn’t write off the Random Houses of the world too quickly…

Character, not rhetoric or ‘celebrity’: what we SHOULD demand of our politicians

Here are the last few paragraphs of a very good column in the Wall Street Journal (wsj.com) from former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan. She’s writing about the US midterms elections, and does it with insight and verve, and her point goes wider …

Conservatives talked a lot about Ronald Reagan this year, but they have to take him more to heart, because his example here is a guide. All this seemed lost last week on Sarah Palin, who called him, on Fox, “an actor.” She was defending her form of political celebrity—reality show, “Dancing With the Stars,” etc. This is how she did it: “Wasn’t Ronald Reagan an actor? Wasn’t he in ‘Bedtime for Bonzo,’ Bozo, something? Ronald Reagan was an actor.”

Excuse me, but this was ignorant even for Mrs. Palin. Reagan people quietly flipped their lids, but I’ll voice their consternation to make a larger point. Ronald Reagan was an artist who willed himself into leadership as president of a major American labor union (Screen Actors Guild, seven terms, 1947-59.) He led that union successfully through major upheavals (the Hollywood communist wars, labor-management struggles); discovered and honed his ability to speak persuasively by talking to workers on the line at General Electric for eight years; was elected to and completed two full terms as governor of California; challenged and almost unseated an incumbent president of his own party; and went on to popularize modern conservative political philosophy without the help of a conservative infrastructure. Then he was elected president.

The point is not “He was a great man and you are a nincompoop,” though that is true. The point is that Reagan’s career is a guide, not only for the tea party but for all in politics. He brought his fully mature, fully seasoned self into politics with him. He wasn’t in search of a life when he ran for office, and he wasn’t in search of fame; he’d already lived a life, he was already well known, he’d accomplished things in the world.

Here is an old tradition badly in need of return: You have to earn your way into politics. You should go have a life, build a string of accomplishments, then enter public service. And you need actual talent: You have to be able to bring people in and along. You can’t just bully them, you can’t just assert and taunt, you have to be able to persuade.

Americans don’t want, as their representatives, people who seem empty or crazy. They’ll vote no on that.
It’s not just the message, it’s the messenger.

Read the whole column at wsj.com.

I’ve watched shallow people lining up to race for political posts. I’ve seen elected people trying to use any populist platform they could find to try to build ‘celebrity’, hoping it will translate into name recognition, and thus, votes. Such is democracy.

As Churchill said:

“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

Big whoop

This made me chuckle.
In my travels I’ve seen advisory signs alerting passersby to notable sights and landmarks. Eiffel Tower, Lincoln Memorial, Place des Arts, Buckingham Palace, Empire State Building, Raffles Hotel, Petronas Towers, Taipei 101, Golden Gate Bridge, etc….

Here’s one I saw today:

Awesome!

Gee, I wouldn’t want to have just driven by.

A fork in the road

Written with different events in mind (i.e. Rick Sanchez’s anti-semitic rant – since apologised for – and Juan Williams being axed from NPR following his revealing ‘When I see muslims on airplanes I get nervous’ gaff) this e-postcard made me chuckle about a local situation.

The only thing worse than a public figure saying something racist is having to hear your opinion on it. (image: http://www.someecards.com click for more)

It’s true: no one likes being labelled a racist — or ‘called’ on apparent bigotry, and much worse, having people opine about it. It can be hurtful, bewildering and embarrassing when someone takes issue with one’s own words and actions in a negative way — interpreting us in a way that we hadn’t intended or predicted they would do.

Even hot, earnest, SHOUTED denials of prejudice cannot obscure the picture of us that our own words and actions create for others to see. This, despite the nuanced, complex, multi-layered image of ourselves we see when we look in the mirror. Neither, finally, does comfort provided by the cosy club of our coterie ease the pain of the miscomprehension of our core … by critics.

I’ve referred in another context to the The Animals who sang so eloquently:

I’m just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood

Is anything on the web ‘public domain’ — as this editor asserts?

Tell that to Rupert Murdoch!

Here’s the story, and it’s brazen, baby, really brazen… Continue reading →

Politics is a full contact sport — but there are limits

“This is a contact sport, politics. You can’t complain about being attacked.”  
— Bill Clinton.

He was probably quoting former US Senator Alan Simpson, who famously used the phrase ‘Politics is a contact sport’ in his 2002 Peltason lecture, and ever since, invoking it to describe his good mate Teddy Kennedy…

Politics is a contact sport. You’re going to get beat up, but never let them distort who you are.

Kennedy knew politics was a contact sport. He could handle things with good humor and a big smile and a huge laugh that was like the back room of an Irish pub.

But there are some things that are over the line, in my view, and the vitriol of some opponents would stretch even a saint’s good humour. One example is the HATEFUL portrayal of President Barack Obama promulgated in a series of ‘pro-life’ ads advocating Colorado’s Proposition 62 the ‘personhood’ bill seeking to outlaw abortion.

So-called pro-lifers displaying their hate. I'm glad they lost Proposition 62. Again. This is Evil.

A ghastly, shameful ad literally calls Obama ‘The Angel of Death’ and morphs his face onto a skeletal hooded angel image, then later morphs him into the ‘Joker’ in a dark portrayal a la Heath Ledger playing a murderous sociopath in The Dark Knight movie. Disgusting.

Although I have genuine sympathy for their cause, and respect their sincerity — and their faith — I find myself glad their proposition failed. Ad hominem tactics like that deserve no reward. The activists squander their moral authority and undermine their humanity with this evil garbage, in my view, despite their sincerity. What a trap.

On the same theme, George W Bush revealed this week that the ‘worst moment of his presidency’ was when Kanye West condemned him as a racist in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the botched response to the catastrophe of New Orleans. (West actually said “George Bush doesn’t care about black people” at a Red Cross telethon fundraiser for victims of Katrina.)

Bush took that criticism very hard, he said …

“I resent it, it’s not true, and it was one of the most disgusting moments in my Presidency” … “the suggestion that I was racist because of the response to Katrina represented an all time low”

… which made me reflect on my comments about some of my fellow Howick residents and their campaign determinedly opposing a very small effort to teach Maori culture in Howick’s Garden of Memories.

I wonder if they take my description and interpretation of their actions and my criticisms as hard? (e.g. “Bigotry has to be opposed, whatever it is dressed up as.”)
Probably not. But I had a twinge of empathy.

Then tonight I went to the first meeting of the newly elected Howick Local Board and the politician who featured so prominently (shouting ‘I’m not racist!’ into people’s faces) during the ‘full-blown race war’ confrontation filmed by Marae Investigates, Michael Williams, was elected chairman. Continue reading →

Your tax dollars at work

image: http://picses.eu

This is how democracy should work. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Good on the Labour and Green MPS for pushing the issue.

[NZ Parliament’s] Speaker Lockwood Smith has caved in to pressure to release MPs spending on their travel perks after political parties rebelled against his initial stance by releasing their own expenses.

Today Dr Smith re-issued the last quarters’ expense disclosure with the cost of MPs travel perks included again. He said he would continue to include the costs of that travel in the future.

In a statement he said he had released the full set of expenses because of confusion created by the decision of some parties to release their own expenses. ….

NZ Herald

Lockwood Smith is OK in my book. I could sort of see what he was thinking with his view that the travel perks were a legitimate entitlement MPs might feel embarrassed about using because of public scrutiny —  sort of — but the public suspicion Members of Parliament act like ‘pigs at the trough’ (whether that’s a fair impression or not) can only be countered by full and regular clear disclosure. That’s the trend, chaps and chappesses, like it or not.

(Don’t get me started on Roger Douglas’s entitlement mentality, please. Or Rodney ‘perk-buster’ Hide.)

Let’s be reasonable…

Here’s a sign from the San Francisco satellite rally of Jon Stewart’s Rally to Restore Sanity, inspired, I think, by a line he delivered on The Daily Show.

I think it’s just brilliant.

'I may disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler.' (image Huffington Post)

In my dealings with those with whom I strongly disagree about things that are important to me, I make a real effort not to demonise them or write them off as idiots. I believe in dialogue.

For instance, I’ve emphasised to several members of the Howick local political community that I don’t regard them as insincere or corrupt, but I completely disagree with their stance on some issues and I’m critical of their actions. Further, I personally interpret their actions as based on ignorant racism and bigotry and also feel they don’t represent me or people like me.

I do and will oppose those actions. But that doesn’t make them fascists or Nazis in my book, and I don’t wish them ill personally. Likewise with the hyperbolic spruikers I tackle from time to time like Dean Letfus, Shaun Stenning, Steve Goodey and others.

I disagree with what they’re doing, and will say so … but I’m pretty sure they’re not Hitler.

UPDATE: Oh look, T-shirts! ..

That's entrepreneurial! (click)

Continue reading →

Jon Stewart’s closing remarks at the ‘Rally to Restore Sanity’

Reportedly, 215,000 people turned out in Washington DC today (image: HuffingtonPost)

I was impressed with this (I’ve left it out of blockquote to help readability. It’s all Jon Stewart, including his description of the media as a “24-hour, political pundit perpetual panic conflictinator”):

“And now I thought we might have a moment, however brief, for some sincerity. If that’s okay — I know that there are boundaries for a comedian/pundit/talker guy, and I’m sure that I’ll find out tomorrow how I have violated them.
[Comment: not a complete transcript.]

So, uh, what exactly was this? I can’t control what people think this was: I can only tell you my intentions.

This was not a rally to ridicule people of faith, or people of activism, or look down our noses at the heartland, or passionate argument, or to suggest that times are not difficult and that we have nothing to fear–they are, and we do.

But we live now in hard times, not end times. And we can have animus, and not be enemies. But unfortunately, one of our main tools in delineating the two broke.

The country’s 24-hour, political pundit perpetual panic conflictinator did not cause our problems, but its existence makes solving them that much harder. The press can hold its magnifying glass up to our problems, bringing them into focus, illuminating issues heretofore unseen. Or they can use that magnifying glass to light ants on fire, and then perhaps host a week of shows on the dangerous, unexpected flaming ants epidemic. If we amplify everything, we hear nothing.

There are terrorists, and racists, and Stalinists, and theocrats, but those are titles that must be earned! You must have the resume! Not being able to distinguish between real racists and Tea Party-ers, or real bigots and Juan Williams or Rick Sanchez is an insult–not only to those people, but to the racists themselves, who have put in the exhausting effort it takes to hate. Just as the inability to distinguish terrorists from Muslims makes us less safe, not more. Continue reading →

The superlatives still run hot for Leonard Cohen

Leonard Cohen in concert, Auckland 29 October (Pic: Dean Purcell, NZ Herald) click to read the review

Another night, another happy and satisfied bunch of Leonard Cohen fans. My pal Graeme went and sent me a text at the intermission, saying ‘Now I know what you were talking about!‘ Cool.

What a great comment!

I just had to share this neat little story. How cool.

from a comment thread at Huffington Post on an article about Jon Stewart's upcoming Rally to Restore Sanity (click)

As text below the fold Continue reading →

Nice to be clear – Mark Coker on e-Books

I enjoyed a fascinating and informative day at the NZ Society of Authors seminar, Publishing for Authors — the whole picture yesterday.

Inexorable trend — just a matter of time — Mark Coker

One of the keynote speakers was Mark Coker of Smashwords who talked about the past and preset of e-books, trends in the market, and the mistakes he sees US publishers making that perhaps we can learn to avoid. It was a really worthwhile session (see his slideshow below the fold).

I learned a lot from this likeable man whose business, which acts as a marketing/distribution platform for self-published and professionally published e-books, has experienced phenomenal growth as part of the wave. He told us Smashwords listed 140 e-books at the end of 2008, 6,000 e-books by end of 2009, and 22,500 by Sept this year 2010.

Mark’s analysis of the drivers of the traditional publishing model (mainly: control and, lately, risk mitigation) and the playing field-equalising effect of software and our move (headlong sprint?) to the internet really rang true. The money ‘equation’ and the prospect of added control means that more and more authors are becoming publishers, and more professional authors will go independent (becoming ‘indie’ publishers like indie filmmakers).

Publishers are losing control of the bricks and mortar, he said, which will, with the rise of e-books and print-on-demand solutions, become increasing irrelevant. Reading is unquestionably, demonstrably moving to screens. Continue reading →

Why do you think we call it a struggle?

I referred earlier this week in ‘Words that may not be spoken‘ to what I see as a subversive, long-running and concerted political campaign which aims to suppress Maori culture in Howick, Auckland, where I live. That’s how I see it. I’ll explain why.

Along with the rest of New Zealand, we’ve just had local authority elections.
Sadly, from my point of view, it appears that an unhealthy fixation with keeping Maori culture out of Howick — or at least keeping it ‘in its place‘ has survived the election process.

The 'repair' option (used as a delaying tactic by opponents of the 'rebuild' option) has been taken off the table. Pic by Peter Aranyi 19 October 2010 (click to enlarge)

Indeed, a majority of the newly-elected local board appears to want to prevent the reinstatement of the whare — a burnt-out little meeting house in Howick’s Garden of Memories, where it has been located since the 1930s.

The eight (of nine) have reportedly even gone so far as to sign a ludicrous petition to ‘declare independence‘ from the Manukau City Council (!) over its decision to proceed with the plan to rebuild the community-owned building.

As I see it, the campaign opposing the whare reinstatement project has a racist, xenophobic, even white supremacist undertone. (They deny this, of course, and it’s not very ‘neutral’ of me to say it so plainly, but actions speak louder than words.)

This is only the latest skirmish in the battle which has been underway for years. Far too long. As such it’s worth opposing. It’s a fight worth fighting. Justice delayed is justice denied and these time-wasters have cost us enough.

Here’s some background to the latest push: Continue reading →

Words fail me

What does it take? (click to be scandalised)

Not a good look for the Serious Fraud Office. Disappointing is an understatement.