Review: An odious little volume

Is this Shaun Stenning's internet marketing? Be a thief?

An intriguing document landed in ThePaepae.com mailbox for my review recently. It appears to be a guide to (supposedly) making money through the internet by adopting ‘blackhat’ techniques used by ‘YouTube Traffic Thieves‘.

From appearances, this MAY emanate from spruiker Dean Letfus’s new business partner itinerant salesman and self-proclaimed internet expert Shaun Stenning (or perhaps one of his henchmen colleagues?) judging by the ‘twa.lk 2.0’, ‘make big money on social media’ branding (not to mention the giveaway typos and poor grammar).

But I note there is NO author’s credit, publisher, copyright notice, nor contact details showing on the document as I received it, so it may be that Shaun Stenning et al has simply plastered his (latest) branding on someone else’s work. I really don’t know. (If you can shed light on this, and you care, please let me know. And feel free to send me more material.)

Whatever its origins, it is an ODIOUS little volume, let me tell you.

It’s interesting to note it carries this anonymous ‘disclaimer’, neatly demonstrating the term we recently touched on in another discussion, consciousness of guilt:

Hardly confidence-inspiring, is it? (Source: YouTube Traffic Thieves report)

The unnamed author shares dodgy methods he uses — and he says you can try at your own risk — to hijack people watching videos on YouTube and driving ‘traffic’ to your websites (ka-ching!) — with no value added, it seems to me. In fact, some of the techniques are downright dishonest, in my opinion. (Hence the disclaimer, I guess.)

Here are some extracts, to give you a sense of the ‘flavour’:
Continue reading →

The Golden Rule

The Golden Rule Hinduism
‘Never do to others what would pain you’
Panchatantra 3.104
Buddhism
‘Hurt not others with that which hurts yourself.’
Udana 5.18
Zoroastrianism
‘Do not to others what is not well for oneself.’
Shayast-na-shayast 13.29
Jainism
‘One who neglects existence disregards their own existence’
Mahavira
Confucianism
‘Do not impose on others what you do not yourself desire.’
Analects 12.2
Taoism
‘Regard your neighbour’s loss or gain as your own loss or gain.’
Tai Shang Kan Ying Pien
Baha’I
‘Desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.’
Baha’Ullah 66
Judaism
‘What is hateful to you do not do to your neighbour.’
Talmud, Shabbat, 31a
Christianity
‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’.
Matthew 7.12
Islam
‘Do unto all people as you would they should do to you.’
Mishkat-el-Masabih
Sikhism
‘Treat others as you would be treated yourself.’
Adi Granth

Thanks to http://wecan.be/ for this fine summary.

(Not sure I always do this … – P.)

Thanks to S.

Tweaking your Facebook privacy – video guide

A 2 minute guide from Huffington Post.

Also useful (but a little out of date): 10 Privacy Settings Every Facebook User Should Know from Allfacebook.com

FWIW

Backlash, anyone?

Apropos yesterday’s Google’s tentacles post, see the outrage being provoked even in the home of the free:

Germany’s data protection authority (DPA) requested Google audit the WiFi data collected by its Street View cars. The audit revealed that contrary to the company’s claims, for at least three years, Google has been collecting payload data (the information users send over a wireless network) from non-password-protected WiFi networks. A programming error from 2006 was at fault.

Read Google’s mea culpa here and reaction here at Huffington Post.

iPhone thief’s accomplice stashes evidence at church(!) plus Gizmodo’s shameful blackmail …

So a judge has unsealed the evidence supporting the search warrant on [alleged] receiver of stolen G4 iPhone Gizmodo ‘editor’ Jason Chen who paid Brian Hogan thousands of dollars for the ‘lost’ prototype … and, as well as a pretty incriminating narrative of events, buried in it was a lovely line about ‘consciousness of guilt’ … as Wired reports.

Stolen goods. image: nzherald.co.nz

Police were preparing a search warrant affidavit for Hogan’s apartment two days later, when Martinson phoned them to report that Hogan and a second roommate, Thomas Warner, were in the process of removing evidence from their Redwood City apartment: a desktop computer, stickers from the iPhone, a thumb drive and a memory card. Police raced to the apartment, but by the time they arrived, Hogan and Warner had left in separate cars with the evidence.

The police headed to Hogan’s parents’ house, also in Redwood City, and were let in by Hogan’s father. They found Brian Hogan sitting on his bed with his girlfriend. When the cops told Hogan that removing evidence implied “consciousness of guilt,” Hogan agreed to cooperate, and phoned his friend Warner, who had taken the computer gear and the stickers away in his car.

Warner directed the police to the nearby Sequoia Christian Church, where the cops recovered Hogan’s black desktop PC and flatscreen monitor outside an administrative office. Warner initially claimed he didn’t know where the other evidence was, but eventually told police where they could find the thumb drive and memory stick hidden in a bush.

That ‘consciousness of guilt’ is a nice concept that I think must apply even to hardened con-artists — or do they overcome it with practise, like excess alcohol apparently suppressed the vomit reflex in a student who tragically died this week after reportedly downing a full bottle of vodka?

Some spruikers, as we have seen, over-compensate with voluminous public statements about their own innocence, integrity and moral purity — sometimes invoking their religion. Are they too, stashing evidence of their crimes in a local church? Makes you wonder. Continue reading →

The Introduction continues…

Hmmm…

I had hoped to be done with this nonsense but it seems that exnzpat is not going to let me enjoy my summer!

I have received so many emails asking as to exnzpat’s health I should perhaps address that issue first…

Murder in any sense, but especially in reality, is neither sensational nor exciting – what it is – what it really is — is just sad.  Let me describe exnzpat’s delusions and from that you will better understand him…

The Madness

Let me start with the soul that exnzpat claims to have possessed him…

You should know that exnzpat speaks of an evolved human creature from the future that, by accident, traveled backwards in time to the 1930’s and had continued to live amongst us until he murdered his wife and son in the very same house during the 1970’s; then during his own trial this man took his own life in the home; his name was Scudamour.

Scudamour, it seems (according to exnzpat), comes from a human future that is not spatiality orientated like ours, but chronologically oriented.  In other words, where you and I see Time as a tightrope that can be walked in only one direction – forward – and Space we see directions of left and right, front and back, and up and down.  This Scudamour came from a place that sees only the opposite.  Space, it seems in Scudamour’s world, is no more a backdrop to existence as the passage of time is to us.  We would think it queer to walk in the sands time and yet keep patience to a clock of space.

Now… and this is where things get strange, Scudamour built and designed the house exnzpat would later buy.  This house was constructed in such a manner that the attic is disconnected from the dimensions of Space but connected to the dimensions of Time (if this makes sense).  Scudamour designed this place as a refuge for himself until he could find a device to transport himself back into the place whence he was rudely brought.  Scudamour’s attic was a place for insertion of and resurrection from death.  Scudamour’s being, his true self, used this attic – this lair – as an escape from our universe – it is, exnzpat tells me, a refuge from God and from Hell — and those that enter willingly can, if the desire takes them, exit too — if they can find the door.  It is from this place that Scudamour reached down and took possession of exnzpat’s biological entity and murdered the exnzpat family… this he tells me – with tears of love in his eyes – was how it happened.  Continue reading →

Hello, Jason? Asperger’s doesn’t equal ‘sociopath’

OK, so we all know Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has a reputation for being treacherous and a bit of an arse, but this reference by Jason Calacanis to Asperger’s syndrome seems like sloppy labelling to me … otherwise, it’s an interesting opinion piece. A little self-indulgent, but that’s part of Jason’s recipe.

Last year, when I realized that Zuckerberg was an amoral, Asperger’s-like entrepreneur, [Comment: Say what?!?] I told Zynga CEO Mark Pincus that Zuckerberg would try and slit his throat. I knew this because I watched Zuckerberg screw over his users again and again in terms of privacy, and I heard about the stories of him screwing over his former employers at ConnectU and his early partners at Facebook.

The money quote from Business Insider’s scoop comes from Zuckerberg himself: “they made a mistake haha. They asked me to make it for them. So I’m like delaying it so it won’t be ready until after the facebook thing comes out.” He stalled and sandbagged ConnectU–then Zuckerpunched them! Of course, the person he said this to was his partner–Eduardo Saverin–who he reportedly screwed as well.

Read all here: Business Insider: At Last — The Full Story Of How Facebook Was Founded

Add to all this that Zuckerberg was stealing every tiny innovation the second Evan Williams and the team over at Twitter released it, and Zuckerberg is clearly the worst thing that’s happened to our industry since, well, spam.

The whole rant is worth a read … including this:

Anyone who trusts Facebook to do the right thing for the industry, their customers or their application partners simply needs to look at their history. Remember Frank’s First Rule from “Scarface”: “Lesson number one: Don’t underestimate the other guy’s greed!”

Plenty of tech people/geeks have Asperger’s tendencies — that doesn’t make them amoral, anti-social, grasping, double-crossing liars. See Asperger’s Syndrome, Sociopaths And Bipolar Disorder.

I’m just sayin’.

Google’s tentacles worm closer …

Google alerts keep track of people and things of interest

Does anyone else see a problem with this?

Please explain: why Google wants your Wi-Fi data

LOUISA HEARN | The Age | May 13, 2010
Google Australia will today be sent a “please explain” letter from two local privacy organisations demanding to know why the company has been collecting personal Wi-Fi network data from Australian homes alongside the images it takes with its Street View cameras.

The letter comes in response to recent reports that the company has been quietly collecting Wi-Fi data around the world when taking pictures of streets and houses for its mapping service

Apparently one of Google’s arguments is that collating the location of your home or business wifi network will help users of their Android mobile phones to locate themselves if their in-built GPS is having trouble.

Oh, that’s OK then. Yeah right!

Quite a good digest from SecureComputing.net.au: Google defends Street View Wi-Fi data collection includes this quote:

German federal data protection commissioner Peter Schaar was quoted in German newspaper Spiegel last week as saying he was “horrified” to discover the practice, and said that it was being carried out “without the knowledge of third parties”.

To which Google replies soothingly, ‘Eat my shorts!’ (OK that’s a paraphrase. Read the article.)

Facebook Privacy options – NY Times graphical guide

Facebook, as we have discussed, is to privacy what water is to oil — i.e. no relation. You need to know this.

The New York Times took the, um, time to examine and graphically portray the ‘options’ and ‘settings’ — their tagline:

Facebook Privacy: A Bewildering Tangle of Options

To manage your privacy on Facebook, you will need to navigate through 50 settings with more than 170 options. Facebook says it wants to offer precise controls for sharing on the Internet.

… which surprised even me.

Click on the graphic below to visit the full size version at the NY Times.

Their article Price of Facebook Privacy? Start Clicking is worth reading and discusses the gargantuan ‘privacy policy’ Facebook has developed over the years… 5830 words long — longer than the US Constitution! — and waay (3x) longer than Twitter and other ‘social media’ sites.

And in today’s news… Limewire

'File-sharing' was always a euphemism for copyright theft, in my opinion.

.

LimeWire hammered in copyright case

11:36 AM Thursday May 13, 2010 | NZ Herald [AP story]

LOS ANGELES – File-sharing software company LimeWire has lost a court battle to the major recording companies.

LimeWire has lost its fight with US record companies - but won't be shut down immediately (image: NZ Herald)

A judge with the US District Court in New York ruled this week that the company and its Chairman Mark Gorton were liable for inducing copyright infringement.

The decision doesn’t mean the site will shut down right away. The record labels and LimeWire are to meet with Judge Kimba Wood on June 1 to determine the next steps, such as a possible deal to work together going forward.

… Read on at NZ Herald

Limewire, like Napster and Bit Torrent and Pirate Bay before it — not to mention the discussion yesterday about YouTube’s cascade of nudge-nudge-wink-wink double-talk — have been part of the ‘freeloader culture’ that’s seen a erosion (am I imagining it? Maybe) of intellectual property rights. Taking what’s not yours, or without proper attribution or exchange (e.g. royalties) is an issue of character, in my view.*

As Andrew Keen says, “… we shouldn’t tolerate stealing as the road to profit”.

* My standard disclaimer: (I ain’t saying I’m perfect!) applies. More thoughts on copyright here.

Freeloader culture: taking things that aren’t yours …

Andrew Keen’s opinion column “Copyrights take a back seat to profits on the Web” is worth a read.

image: bartastechnologies.com

Even in the digital world, standards are still necessary and some old rules deserve respect. Creators should still be fairly compensated for their work, and we shouldn’t tolerate stealing as the road to profit.

And, as much as we love YouTube, we shouldn’t countenance the way its founders muscled their way to riches by enabling the online trafficking of stolen videos.

From garage entrepreneurs to mega-millionaires sounds like the quintessential American success story, except that e-mails released recently by a federal judge plainly show that YouTube’s magic elixir was theft, not creativity.

Consider the “business strategy” discussions in which the YouTube co-founders, Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, concede that drew the original traffic to their website largely through offering stolen property which, they well knew, radically inflated the value of their site before they flipped it to Google for $1.65 billion.

As Chen wrote in one e-mail: “if you remove the potential copyright infringements “… site traffic and virality will drop to maybe 20 percent of what it is.”

… I’ve poured my heart into my written work, as have most other professional creative artists, and we expect to be paid a fair price for our honest labor.

As my Arts & Labs colleague Mark McKinnon put it: “It’s not free culture; it’s freeloader culture. When you become a millionaire by stealing other people’s work and get treated like a hero, it tells me that the Internet ecosystem is getting out of whack.”

“… we shouldn’t tolerate stealing as the road to profit”

Amen and amen.

Read the full column at the San Jose Mercury News

(Andrew Keen’s blog is good too.)

Announcing a big, bargain breakthrough MIRACLE …

source: PrintStop catalogue

ANNOUNCING a big, bargain breakthrough MIRACLE that will quickly and easily, immediately (right NOW) directly deliver to YOU complete and absolutely authentic HUGE revolutionary secrets to $ucce$$ and love — with improved powerful PROFIT$.

Endorsed by the LARGEST famous professionals with strange discounts and unique magic gifts. NEW and exciting! Lifetime superior QUALITY specially guaranteed for a better limited time. AMAZING!! [Includes FRESHLY MANUFACTURED social media ‘credibility’ & the latest ‘internet marketing’.]

.

(See what I did there?)

Now, where did I put that box of snake oil?

Multi-touch = the future of interactivity

Not too long ago, this was just a gleam in a techie’s eye. Now look. It’s here.

Meet the future of interactivity … what will we be able to do with this amazing technology?

Can the crooked ever be made straight?

Seth Godin points to a different way.

Authenticity

Some salesmen will use every devious trick in the book to get you to sign the dotted line and make their cold hearts dance ka-ching!

They’ll imitate and fake their way through life, ignoring or brushing over the truth, sucking the life and light out of their victims with hyped up promises and weasel words … which lead to a sense of disappointment, despair and, sometimes, self-blame {viz. ‘How could I have been so naive?’).

Giving the sales profession a bad name in the process, some of them are very plausible and engaging — vigorous in their pursuit of ‘fresh meat’, skilled at manufacturing a sheen of likability and false rapport. Michael Lewis alerts us to some of their devices and tricks in Liar’s Poker and The Big Short.

These purveyors of false hope and cupboard love present a carefully polished veneer of lies and half-truths … or sometimes, as a dodge, a deliberately downbeat man-of-the-people schtick. They’re con-artists, pure and simple, and those who have been practising deception for a lifetime can be very convincing. They have learned from their mistakes and ‘corrected’. They’ve had time to reflect, some of them, on their past blunders or when they’ve been caught flat out lying. Look at their personal history. It speaks.

Eventually, it all catches up with them. Consider Bernie Madoff.
People’s past actions leave a mark, in my experience, and sooner or later they become known for what they ARE.

That’s not the only way to ‘do the business’, despite what they demonstrate. Thank goodness for authentic marketers like Seth Godin. Like him, I’ve learned people trust ‘straight’. Many come to appreciate authenticity, but sometimes after bitter experience with the smooth-talking, charming crooks.

C’est la vie.

Authenticity … the truthfulness of origins, attributions, commitments, sincerity, devotion, and intentions.

For JB. Genuine.

OK, so it’s not a hopeless quest …

Filed here for the sake of completeness: Well done Sarah.

Sarah King: Courage under fire. (Click for link)

It took 5 years and 257 complaints but the Commerce Commission have finally acted on NBO and all the spin off “businesses” operated by Shallendra Singh, Jitendra Singh and Sonia “All I ever did was work for him” Klair who just so happens to also be known as Sonia Singh.

The NZ Herald reports today that NBOL directories have been raided as part of a Commerce Commission investigation the paper describes as ‘an unprecedented crackdown on alleged large-scale invoicing scams’. Search into online scam

Sarah King, an internet consultant who has been warning people about these three websites since 2007, welcomed the action by the Commission: “I’m looking forward to what they do next,” she said.

In June last year King received letters from law firm Hesketh Henry that said her internet articles claiming Shallandra Singh’s businesses were scams were defamatory.

Lawyer Frank Chan, who wrote the letters, said Singh was no longer a client. Financial records show National Business Online defaulted on a $27,997 bill to Hesketh Henry this year.

I’m proud of you Sarah. Good work exposing them.

I don’t have a printable reaction to the news that lawyers Hesketh Henry didn’t get fully paid for their no-doubt-designed-to-intimidate-and-induce-stress threatening letters crap. (oops) I guess that happens a lot. – P