The escape of exnzpat, Part 15

Three of Time and One of Space

“Becky, do you know what a Magus is?” I asked as we walked.  We crested the little ridge that set the interior of the island apart from its beach and the river.  My mood was calm and the strange dusk of the apparent evening helped keep me that way.  The assault by the tree and the subsequent healing by Adam and his wife, Eve, had rounded off the anxious edge to my confused emotions between Becky and Lilith.  The island, the river, and the soft, thatched ground beneath our feet were in themselves restful things and instead of running from them, I now embraced them.  Even the Muppet trees did not worry me, though I was not fool enough to approach them.  About us, they were silent and still; their floppy leaves seemed dulled in the diminishing light of the pendulum moon, for it was clearly on its upward swing, and as it rose, its light became weaker.  Fall had come fast to Wormwood and the colorful shag of the murderous Muppet trees looked as if they had been dipped in saltwater and then left like an abandoned car in a hot sun, so wilted and so rusty did they look they barely appeared to be trees at all.  They had all the look of a forlorn, forgotten heap of sackcloth that I almost forgave the tree that attacked me, almost, but not quite, for all of me felt fine but for my left hand.  It burned like fire, and while the barb that had penetrated it had not left a mark as far as I could see, I wondered if there was some undetected poison in there that Adam had missed.

Becky held that sorry hand as we went and hers felt warm and dry in mine, and I felt happy beside her and because of her, I ignored the throbbing pain it was causing me.

Lincoln rushed about us in a dog’s typical zigzag pattern of sniffing and nose-poking.  He was into everything.  Any rustle in the bushes or any scuttle upon the ground seemed to interest him.  He raced about us like a mad thing, so intent was he he barely noticed us.  Like me, he knew well enough to keep away from the Muppet trees, giving them a wide berth in his endeavor to chase the little creatures that hid in the great Lavender-like bushes that grew in patchwork regularity along the beachhead.  This bush had a high-topped flowery stem that indeed smelled of lavender and so perhaps that’s what it was.  And Lincoln, intent on his chase of whatever little thing he found there dove recklessly in amongst this lavender.  Their waving, flowery tops easily exposed his presence.

Lincoln held, I reflected, a bizarre position within the realm of Universal Celestials; for in Heaven, Hell, or anywhere else that may or may not be out there, he remained to me, an ordinary dog.  And I shook my head in the wonder of it as he romped carelessly in the bushes about us. Continue reading →

Exhibiting one’s nature. Not always pretty.

Steve Jobs book cover-300w

Imperfect (apparently) but well worth reading. I recommend it.

Jobs sometimes avoided the truth. Helmut Sonnenfeldt once said of Henry Kissinger, “He lies not because it’s in his interest, he lies because it’s in his nature.”

From Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson p 287

I’m reading this book at present and really enjoying it.

I’ve learned when dealing with some people that this phenomenon is observable. For no good reason — except their ‘nature’ — they can, do and will act in a certain way. It doesn’t just apply to politicians.

We deny this at our peril.

– P

Echo chamber? Or seeing the world as one wants it to be?

I like receiving Bryce Edwards’ NZ Politics Daily newsletter. It’s a valuable digest of political issues seen through the filter of media coverage, including the blogosphere, and Bryce’s commentary is always worth a read. (Material from The Paepae features now and then too, which I also appreciate.)

Yesterday’s missive reflected the theme of the Thorndon Bubble/Beltway zeitgeist: ‘National is doomed!’, although Bryce’s coverage was, naturally, more muted. It’s fascinating to see the ebullience generated in some quarters (and grim stiffening of features in other quarters) by a smidgen of opinion poll movement. More about that another time.* Politics, like sport, can often come down to a gain or loss of momentum.

Bruce Edwards' NZ Politics Daily — click to read the Pattrick Smellie article cited.

Bruce Edwards’ NZ Politics Daily — click to read Pattrick Smellie’s ‘must read’ article cited.

Personally, I think there’s a lot of water yet to flow under the bridge before the next election, but people — insiders and outside observers — are free to speculate and enthuse, as they will, until the cows come home.

I agree with Bryce, Pattrick’s piece Tricky issues could haunt Nats is interesting reading.

– P

*Briefly, my view: Don’t believe the hype.

Alastair Campbell demolishes the Daily Mail’s deputy editor Jon Steafel (video)

A master class on BBC Newsnight.

“The Daily Mail is the worst of British values, posing as the best”.

The self-parody of calling someone ELSE ‘sanctimonious’

Look, let me be very clear about this, as I have said in another context:

‘The left are so sanctimonious’ — is virtually a self-parodying remark, if you possess the self-awareness to perceive it.

God knows, there are plenty of times I’ve been accused of being sanctimonious* and of ‘pontificating’ (amazingly, usually by people who disagree with me. Whowouldathunkit?). But criticism, its side-effects and its pitfalls is, for better or worse, one of the running themes of this blog.

How else would I get to quote, in agreement, such classic lines as Whitney Balliett’s definition:

A critic is a bundle of biases
held loosely together
by good taste.

That said, let me acknowledge up-front that there is something vaguely self-parodying and roomful of mirrors-esque about me pointing this (below) out — critically:

The NZ Herald 'Gossip' column reports celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton 'hyping' a 'feud'. Jeez, Morgan. Really?

The NZ Herald ‘Gossip’ column reports celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton ‘hyping a feud’. Jeez, Morgan. Really?

Oh boy.

– P

* You may also be interested in: A small update: now I am ‘a sanctimonious twat’, too, apparently.

Matthew Hooton regrets (cough) using ‘that particular word’. Of course he does.

With all due respect to Radio New Zealand, it seems to me they are indulging a notable double standard with respect to Matthew Hooton, and quite possibly being gamed by the National Party spin doctor.

Today’s Nine to Noon political segment began with noble Lynn Freeman reading again Radio New Zealand’s “position” on their ‘commentator from the Right’ Matthew Hooton using taxpayer-funded airwaves to assassinate the character of a senior Opposition politician.

Listen below (at 0’28”) as Matthew delivers much the same ‘I was wrong to use that particular word’ sophistry and his mealy-mouthed Clayton’s apology. (Yes, sure Matthew. Wrong word. Four times. And having been told to shut up) … not very convincing.

Compare Matthew’s calm and reasoned tones today with his Shaker-like raving (‘Lies!’ and ‘Liar!’) just a week ago (clip here).
Continue reading →

Flogging a dead horse? Yeah, consider stopping that.

On a visit to New York City in the lead-up to the 2008 US Presidential election, I was walking along a Manhattan street when someone thrust this flyer into my hand:

Ralph Nader handbill (click to enlarge)

Ralph Nader handbill (click to enlarge)

Wow. The legendary consumer and industrial safety advocate (Unsafe at Any Speed) and left wing political activist Ralph Nader would be speaking that very night on 95th Street. At the time, I was staying with a friend near 96th and Amsterdam Ave, so that was literally right in my backyard. Of course I went along.

Oh, what a disappointment.

Continue reading →

Matthew Hooton: an apology

hootonSpin doctor and Oscar-nominated* actor Matthew Hooton has added his own apology (well, sorta-kinda) to those of the two media outlets which broadcast his pre-determined, calculated smear of the Leader of the Opposition.

Writing in the National Business Review (hilariously in an article he says will be behind a paywall tomorrow morning, Matthew challenged Radio LIVE’s Duncan Garner for the coveted ‘Most mealy mouthed, equivocal apology’ award.

For the record, these are the words Matthew used:

20130929-170817.jpg

Like a parent concealing grated vegetables inside their burger mix in an effort to sneak vege-goodness into their kids (or a spy novel baddie doing something similar with ground glass?) Matthew buried his apology in a cold and crafted reprise of his hit-job on David Cunliffe. As one would expect from him. So, smear followed by fall-back smear.
Continue reading →

Obama on MLK speech 50th Anniversary

20130927-210303.jpg

I know I’m late to this. I just spotted this photo in Barack Obama’s Instagram feed. (I ‘follow’ it, but pretty much abandoned Instagram when Facebook bought it.)

I’ve stood on that spot (yeah, tourist, me) at the top of the steps in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC, right on the battered little sign: Dr Martin Luther King delivered his ‘I Have A Dream’ speech on this spot on August 28, 1963 …

To me, it is so fitting that President Obama should stand there — he who embodies Dr King’s sentiment:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

That and the gift of inspirational oratory they share.

Very cool.

– P

Frankly, I can’t see how ‘bomber’ Matthew Hooton can survive as a political commentator [UPDATED]

I honestly hadn’t bothered listening to Matthew Hooton’s foaming hit-job on the new Opposition Leader on Radio NZ National earlier this week, but having heard a statement and ‘apology’ from Radio NZ’s Kathyrn Ryan (below) — issued through clenched teeth this morning — I went to the RNZ website and listened to it.

Wow. What a cynical, nasty performance. He started pretty calmly, but Matthew really lost it. It’s actually embarrassing. So is listening to the host, poor Ms Ryan, uselessly trying to rein the desperate spin doctor in. Here’s the relevant clip from Monday’s Nine to noon ‘Politics’ segment:


MP3 file

It seems to me Matthew’s apparent loss of self-control and the way he ignored the host’s calls for him to ‘stop it there’ — to stop using Radio NZ as a platform for repeatedly calling David Cunliffe a liar — disqualify him. Sorry, Matthew. Goodbye. (Or perhaps it was a resignation letter?)

Here’s Kathryn Ryan reading Radio NZ’s statement this morning:


MP3 file

Frankly, alongside Matthew Hooton’s earlier public statement that Nicky Hager is a “commo c*nt” and his obvious disrespect for Ms Ryan and contempt for Radio NZ’s editorial standards, I just can’t see room for him on that show, nor any show, as a ‘political commentator’.

But that’s just my opinion. Perhaps Matthew will be happily employed in such roles on Radio NZ National and Radio LIVE from now on, uninterrupted all the way to next year’s general election. Some in the National Party might be hoping so, I guess.

– P

UPDATE: Here’s Radio LIVE’s ambivalent ‘apology’ to David Cunliffe following Matthew Hooton’s routine on Duncan Garner’s show.


MP3 file

Pretty shabby Duncan.

What’s wrong with this picture? Nothing.

Twitter was … atwitter today about an [alleged] ‘selfie’ by Bill Clinton (below) which Bill Gates tweeted:


Gates-Clinton-selfie

Now, I saw it and my first thought was: Gee — why isn’t it even in focus? Then I looked at the file and thought, Gee that’s a big pic for a phone-camera. I wonder what phone it was?

Inspector-Clinton-pic

Hmm, a Sony NEX-5N … is that a phone? Nope …

Sony NEX-5N Review_ Digital Photography Review

So, it’s a good quality, interchangeable lens digital camera. So, again: Why is the photo so out of focus?
What is actually IN focus? Oh …

Gates-Clinton-selfie-background-adj-shadow

Right. Makes total sense.

– P

Left and Right: useful when doing the hokey cokey, but past its use-by date for politics?

“I put my right hand in,
I put my right hand out,
In out, in out.
shake it all about. …”
— words to the popular 1940s participation song (from Wikipedia)

Tag-team-wrestling

Did anyone else notice these two “paid PR practitioners” (to quote Steven Joyce) tag-team wrestling to smear the Opposition Leader? Going for their ‘Teamwork’ badge?

Prompted by Bill Ralston’s use of the label ‘the Left’ above and an earlier comment in another thread wherein Ivan says:

I’m not a leftie .. or a rightie … I’m just confused.

… I got thinking (again) about how underpowered that ‘Left’ vs ‘Right’ nomenclature seems when used to describe political ideologies.

For instance, ask yourself, how useful is this label?:

Jordan Williams is a lobbyist for right wing interest groups

Right Wing Commentator. TV3’s The Nation calls a spade a spade.(pic: frontpage.co.nz)

Put aside for the moment how tenable you think it might be to ask Jordan Williams — neatly labelled a ‘Right Wing Commentator’ — to wax lyrical on the topic ‘What are Labour’s problems?’ (I mean, Bill Ralston gets asked for his opinions about ‘the Left’ all the time, so, bokay.)

I don’t know how Jordan feels about being so classified by the media. He may be immensely proud. In my own observation, Jordan describes himself as ‘a constitutional lawyer’ or a ‘public lawyer’ (two noble vocations) — descriptions which nicely blur the lines. What is he really?

Based on his track record (fronting the Peter Shirtcliffe/Simon Lusk anti-MMP campaign and Don Brash’s ACT Party leadership coup) I personally see Jordan as a paid political mouthpiece — nothing more, nothing less. He is, it seems to me, merely another lobbyist who, it appears, works for ‘right wing’ figures or interest groups. (As if we need more of those, eh Bill? Sheesh!)

Now, I might be doing Jordan Williams a terrible disservice. It may be that he’s done/does amazing work for Greenpeace, or the People’s Centre/Community Law, or a trade union. I’m genuinely open to correction on that score. (Let me know in comments below.)

“both sides of the political spectrum” – that’s a pretty narrow spectrum if you ask me

I read here, in an announcement that the author of The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt (whose ideas we’ve discussed here before e.g.) was to join New York University as a Professor of Business Ethics. Congratulations to him, I  must say. As you read this clip, look for another example of the widespread, almost unconscious use of the creaky Left vs Right not-so-much-a-spectrum-as-a-partisan/binary-divide model …

Continue reading →

A hint of siege mentality from Steve Joyce?

Steven Joyce on America's Cup and Chorus (click to watch 7'39" at TVNZ.co.nz)

Steven Joyce on America’s Cup and Chorus – TVNZ Q&A (click to watch 7’39” at TVNZ.co.nz)

I watched an interview with Steven Joyce on TVNZ’s Q&A show yesterday and, as has happened before, was pretty impressed with his commendable communication skills … up to a point. Then, as has also happened before, I watched him unravel a bit as he descended into ‘political’ debate.

Yeah, well, ‘Yawn’, you might say. Fair enough.

But what interested me about yesterday’s effort was when Mr Joyce started smearing specific ‘paid PR practitioners’who are working as lobbyists for those opposed to the government’s pricing policy on copper broadband (look elsewhere for the details).

I took those references to be to Matthew Hooton (whom I have discussed here before, and will again, in another context, in a day or two).

I’m pretty sure I heard Matthew declare to Kathryn Ryan during last week’s Politics discussion on Radio NZ National that he is working for (i.e. professionally engaged by) the group advocating for a change in the copper pricing policy. So … in that context, read what Steven Joyce told Michael Parkin yesterday from San Francisco (full transcript at TVNZ):

MICHAEL But you’ve now got a powerful lobby group here trying to overdo your work here. I mean, you can understand that people at home using the internet don’t like the idea of having the price artificially inflated on them. It’s that simple, isn’t it?

STEVEN Yeah, but that’s wrong. And you can call it a powerful lobby group, but fundamentally they are misrepresenting the facts a wee bit, and that’s the issue. The first thing is they’re suggesting that somehow that the contract is being changed, and it simply isn’t. They’re suggesting that somehow that Chorus is going to get a big bonus, which it simply isn’t. And they’re suggesting that prices are going to go up, which they’re simply not. Prices are actually going to go down. So apart from that, you know, I suppose their argument has some mortar, but with the greatest respect to them, they are being a bit cute, and I think they know they’re being a bit cute.[Comment: By ‘cute’, I think Mr Joyce actually means ‘dishonest’, don’t you?]

MICHAEL Minister, did you underestimate the pushback you were going to get when you made this decision to change these prices?

STEVEN No, I don’t think so. I mean, there’s one or two PR practitioners that are known for this. I remember when I was the minister, they ran a campaign on something else, and the ISPs are quite good at arguing their case, but I noticed that they’re not actually saying, ‘Whatever price cut occurred we’d pass on to consumers’. They are actually talking about who gets to profit what out of the prices charged, so I think we all have just got to be awake to it and know that there is a midpoint here that will work fine and don’t necessarily be taken in by the PR spin from the paid practitioners, because there’s a bit of that going on.
[emphasis added]

Look, I’m not saying there’s a sea change or anything. It’s just interesting.

Punch_and_Judy_by_lonopan-600w
Continue reading →

Staying positive with your team

Sound-board-positive

Be careful about WHEN you load up your teammates with ‘feedback’ or correction. Choose a useful time.

In the offline (i.e. real) world, one of my businesses is a training company.

Over the years, I’ve had the privilege of working with some amazing presenters and speakers. Not the least of those is my founding partner who is, in my view, one of the most inspirational facilitators I have ever seen in action. Her ability to build rapport with a group of people is breathtaking. She is very, very good.

Yesterday I was poking around in our storeroom looking for something, and I came across an old sound control board I used for our seminars years ago. There, prominently stuck on the board on a tatty piece of masking tape, was an important prompt I’d written for myself:

” POSITIVE ! ACK ”

… which was my reminder, that when the facilitator or trainer came to the back of the room (usually having set the participants to work on an activity, or at a session break) that I should ONLY speak positively to them;  that I should acknowledge what was working; and focus feedback (at that time) on what was going well.

I learned over hundreds of hours as a programme director that it’s almost always best to assume your speaker simply cannot absorb correction or criticism while they’re ‘performing’. Unless it’s a safety issue, you are far better to leave any ‘negative’ feedback for a debrief — later. Even the best-intentioned criticism can knock the wind out of their sails, reducing the confidence so crucial to their performance leading a group.
Continue reading →

NYPD promotes iOS7 security features

It’s pretty clear there’s a market for ‘hot’ Apple devices — ‘hot’ as in stolen!

The police think reducing a device’s ability to be reset after theft from its lawful owner will reduce the market. Hence, as Michael Hoffman (@Hoffm) discovered, NYPD are promoting the new security feature of Apple’s iOS7 … with a public information campaign.

Wow - click to see Michael Hoffman's tweet.

Wow – click to see Michael Hoffman’s tweet.