<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad-supported site &#8230; or &#8216;supporting&#8217; the advertisers? A case study.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/</link>
	<description>A Platform for Dialogue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PropertyTalk, public criticism and the public good @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>PropertyTalk, public criticism and the public good @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>[...] are we making these changes….because we have to – to avoid litigation”). I commented on that here: UPDATE: A mind-expanding interchange illuminates another side of this  A friend emailed this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are we making these changes….because we have to – to avoid litigation”). I commented on that here: UPDATE: A mind-expanding interchange illuminates another side of this  A friend emailed this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s head &#8216;em off at the pass! @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#8217;s head &#8216;em off at the pass! @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed the pros and cons of ad-blockers here and here coming up with the golden rule (quoting myself, sorry): Desperate for revenue? Then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed the pros and cons of ad-blockers here and here coming up with the golden rule (quoting myself, sorry): Desperate for revenue? Then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on ad blockers &#8230; @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>More on ad blockers &#8230; @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember our earlier conversation about ad-supported sites suffering from increasing use of ad-blockers? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember our earlier conversation about ad-supported sites suffering from increasing use of ad-blockers? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google &#8216;leaves&#8217; China over censorship @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Google &#8216;leaves&#8217; China over censorship @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...] driven the free-thinkers at Google to submerge their outrage. (This is NOT a long term strategy, as we have discussed in relation to an example closer to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] driven the free-thinkers at Google to submerge their outrage. (This is NOT a long term strategy, as we have discussed in relation to an example closer to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The peasants are revolting @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>The peasants are revolting @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-357</guid>
		<description>[...] this?: Very recently, it seems, under threat and pressure from different advertisers/spruikers, or the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this?: Very recently, it seems, under threat and pressure from different advertisers/spruikers, or the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedicated to my friends at PropertyTalk &#8230; @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedicated to my friends at PropertyTalk &#8230; @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-347</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember who and what you&#8217;re fighting for: the readers, the community, your independence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember who and what you&#8217;re fighting for: the readers, the community, your independence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scoundrels @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoundrels @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] over the weekend a local property personality &amp; spruiker did me the honour of comparing me to outspoken Australian ... Neil Jenman. See earlier mention at bottom of this post.[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the weekend a local property personality &amp; spruiker did me the honour of comparing me to outspoken Australian &#8230; Neil Jenman. See earlier mention at bottom of this post.[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the wall of honour &#8230; Fake Steve Jobs on Google @ The Paepae</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>On the wall of honour &#8230; Fake Steve Jobs on Google @ The Paepae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-343</guid>
		<description>[...] well, um, yup. (And no, don&#8217;t worry: the big fat irony apropos my discussion about censorship earlier this week, is not lost on me.) As I have disclosed before I tend towards the totalitarian fascist, too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] well, um, yup. (And no, don&#8217;t worry: the big fat irony apropos my discussion about censorship earlier this week, is not lost on me.) As I have disclosed before I tend towards the totalitarian fascist, too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thepaepae.com/ad-blockers-not-the-problem/2543/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepaepae.com/?p=2543#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I had a good chat with the owner of a very successful ad-supported blog/news/opinion site today. We discussed the ad-blocker issues and other matters — including the shallow &#039;dirty tricks&#039; some sites play to try to maximise their page views/impressions vs clicks and &#039;effectiveness&#039; -- all with an eye on their rankings and perceived value to advertisers. 

And he told me some tricks the &lt;em&gt;advertisers&lt;/em&gt; try to use too! Let&#039;s discuss that later.

It is a game with layers, for sure,  but I get the impression he agrees with me that the reader comes first — has to come first ... and the reader community should be king, not &#039;monetizing&#039; the site ... anything else will perish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a good chat with the owner of a very successful ad-supported blog/news/opinion site today. We discussed the ad-blocker issues and other matters — including the shallow &#8216;dirty tricks&#8217; some sites play to try to maximise their page views/impressions vs clicks and &#8216;effectiveness&#8217; &#8212; all with an eye on their rankings and perceived value to advertisers. </p>
<p>And he told me some tricks the <em>advertisers</em> try to use too! Let&#8217;s discuss that later.</p>
<p>It is a game with layers, for sure,  but I get the impression he agrees with me that the reader comes first — has to come first &#8230; and the reader community should be king, not &#8216;monetizing&#8217; the site &#8230; anything else will perish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

